SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 119

RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Gopal Chandra Paul – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M. Dev, Adv., N.J. Dutta, Adv., P.N. Choudhury, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Ms. M Dev as well as learned counsel for the State/respondent No. 1, Mr. N J Dutta, Addl. PP, Assam. Also heard Mr. P N Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.

2. The petitioner being the Deputy Manager, State Bank of India, Panbazar, Guwahati lodged an FIR on 07.10.2010 regarding non-availability of the items in the locker No. 1090 of their bank. In the FIR, it was revealed that on that day while the repairing of few lockers of the bank was going on at their request, by the mechanic Sunil Barman in presence of their staff Mirdula Bhattacharjee they found that the aforesaid locker was not properly locked. The fact was immediately brought to the notice of the hirer of the locker Sri Prakash Chandra Medhi and Smti. Hemalata Medhi and they also visited the bank and give the list of the articles not available in the locker.

3. On the basis of the aforesaid FIR Panbazar PS Case No. 336/2010 u/s 461/380 IPC was registered. Several witnesses were examined during the course of investigation and at the conclusion of the investigation, the IO held that as the informant was the In-charge of the locker at th


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top