SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 385

RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Sankar Biswas – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G. Choudhury, Adv., D. Das, Adv., V.K. Chopra, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Rumi Kumari Phukan, J.

Heard Mr. G. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for and on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. VK Chopra, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and Mr. D. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State/respondent No.1.

2. The petitioner herein is facing a trial under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act (NI Act) pertaining to C.R. Case No.2644C /2007 filed by the respondent No.2 for realization of an amount of Rs.1 Lakh.

3. The respondent No.2 filed a complaint before the court on 02.06.2007 contending that the accused-petitioner being the owner of M/s Babai Tyre Agency who used to purchase the goods from the complainant and in order to liquidate the liabilities payable by said M/s Babai Tyre Agency, the accused-petitioner had issued two nos. of cheques of Rs.50,000/- each to the respondent/complainant dated 15.03.2007 and 14.03.2007 and both the cheques were presented before the Bank which returned dishonoured. Thereafter, the complainant issued Demand Notice on 17.04.2007 for payment of the cheque amount but as the cheque amount was not paid, the complainant filed a case under Section 138 of NI Act. The learned trial court accord

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top