SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 526

RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Prasanta Paul – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S.P. Choudhury

JUDGMENT :

1. This Revision is preferred against the judgment and order dated 05.08.2006 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Cachar, Silchar in CR No.2391/2001 convicting the petitioner under section 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and sentencing the petitioner to suffer imprisonment for 6 months and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- in default to suffer imprisonment for one month more.

2. Heard Mr. SK Ghosh, learned counsel for the revision petitioners and Mr. D Das, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

3. The prosecution case in brief is that on 24.05.2001 at about 1.30pm the Food Inspector Sri S Dutta complainant of this case accompanied by Sri HA Laskar, Executive Magistrate, Silchar and two officers of the Food & Civil Supplies visited the shop premises of M/S Raj Trading Co. At Lakhipur Road, Silchar. At that time accused Prasanta Paul was in the shop conducting the affairs of the business. He was the proprietor of the said trading company. They inspected various food articles kept in the shop premises for sale for human consumption. The complainant also introduced himself to the accused as Food Inspector. During the inspection he suspect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top