SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 736

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (AIZAWL BENCH)
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA, J.
C. Dailova - Appellant
Versus
State of Mizoram - Respondent
Regular First Appeal No. 40 of 2012
Decided On : 26-11-2019

Advocates Appeared:
C. Lalramzauva, Adv., A.R. Malhotra, Adv., K. Laldinliana, Adv., Zoramchhana, Adv., Dinari T. Azyu, Adv., C. Zoramchhana, Adv., Victor L. Ralte, Adv., Vanhmingliani, Adv., K. Roland, Adv.

The sale of land under lease terms must comply with lease conditions and registration requirements.

Headnote:

Land Sale Dispute - Land Lease - DLP Misc. No. 43/1995 - Summary

Fact of the Case:

The appellant purchased land covered by a land lease from IKK Republic/ITI Veng, which was later surrendered to the government. A dispute arose with IKK ITI Veng, leading to a court case.

Finding of the Court:

The Trial Court held the sale deed invalid due to lease terms, dismissed the appellant's claim, and decreed the counter claim of IKK ITI Veng representatives.

Issues: Maintainability of the suit and counter claim, validity of the sale deed, entitlement to relief, and counter claim relief entitlement.

Ratio Decidendi: The sale of the land was held void due to lease terms, unregistered sale deed, and lack of right to sell by the IKK Republic/ITI Veng.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, upholding the Trial Court's judgment.

JUDGMENT :

Michael Zothankhuma, J.

Heard Mr. A.R. Malhotra, learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff. Also heard Ms. Mary L. Khiangte, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4/defendant Nos. 1 to 4. Also heard Mrs. Dinary T. Azyu, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 5 & 6/defendant Nos. 5 & 6.

2. This appeal has been filed against the impugned Judgment & Order dated 13.07.2012 passed by the Senior Civil Judge-I, Aizawl, by which Declaratory Suit No. 4/2010 has been dismissed and the counter claim of the respondent Nos. 5 & 6 has been decreed. The subject matter in issue relates to the sale of a lease-hold land covered by a land lease, which was in the name of the Secretary, IKK, ITI Veng. However, the land was sold by the IKK Republic/ITI Veng to the appellant. It should be noted that though the IKK Republic/ITI Veng and IKK, ITI Veng were one single group belonging to one Church denomination earlier, they had split into two groups sometime in December 1994.

3. The appellant's case is that the appellant purchased land from the Church denomination, namely Isua Krista Kohhran, Republic/ITI Veng, (hereinafter referred to as IKK Republic/ITI Veng) on 02.05.2000, by way of an unregistered Sale Deed. The land that had been bought was covered by a land lease bearing Registration No. DLP Misc. No. 43/1995. After selling the land, the IKK, Republic/ITI Veng surrendered the land covered by DLP Misc No. 43/1995 to the Government vide Letter dated 28.05.2000 and requested the Government to issue a Land Pass to the appellant. However, due to the objection raised by the respondent Nos. 5 & 6, who belonged to the IKK, ITI Veng, with regard to the sale of land to the appellant, a dispute arose between the IKK, Republic/ITI Veng and the IKK, ITI Veng, regarding the sale of the land to the appellant. The Government thereafter approved the conversion of the land covered by DLP Misc. No. 43/1995 to a House Site Land Settlement Certificate (LSC), in favour of the appellant on 05.02.2002 and vide Cancellation Order dated 18.02.2002 issued by the Director, Land Revenue & Settlement Department, the DLP Misc. No. 43/1995 was cancelled. Thereafter, Land Settlement Certificate (LSC) No. 104402/01/176 of 2002 was issued in respect of the land in favour of the appellant on 23.09.2004. The Land Revenue & Settlement Department, Govt. of Mizoram had to eventually intervene in the dispute between the parties. A stay order Dated 19.03.2002 was also issued by the Revenue & Settlement Department directing the appellant not to carry on any further development on the suit land. Many attempts were made by the State Government to settle the matter. However, as no settlement could be reached between the parties, the Under Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram, Revenue & Settlement Department issued Letter dated 08.01.2010 to the Director, Land Revenue & Settlement stating that the observation of the Government was that the dispute could not be settled at the Government level and accordingly, the parties were advised to approach the Civil Court.

4. Consequent to the Letter dated 08.01.2010 issued by the Under Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram, Revenue & Settlement Department, the appellant filed Declaratory Suit No. 4/2010 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Aizawl, praying for a decree declaring the appellant as the legal and lawful owner of the land covered by LSC No. 104402/01/176 of 2002, on the ground that he had purchased the same from the respondent Nos. 5 & 6 for Rs. 1.3 lakhs. The other prayer was for a decree declaring that the stay Order dated 19.03.2002 issued by the respondent No. 3 as illegal.

5. The respondent Nos. 5 & 6, who were representatives of the IKK, ITI Veng, filed a counter claim praying for a decree declaring that the appellant did not have the locus standi to file the suit and for declaring the sale deed to be null and void. The respondent Nos. 5 & 6 also prayed that the actions of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4, on the basis of the sale

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top