SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 770

PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA
Andrew Yule and Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Tinsukia Vastra Bhandar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
M. Dey.

JUDGMENT :

Prasanta Kumar Deka, J.

1. Heard Mr. K. Agarwal, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P.J. Saikia learned counsel for the respondent.

2. In this revision petition order dated 31.7.2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Dibrugarh in Misc. (J) Case No. 1/2012 arising out of Money Execution Case No. 2/2007 is under challenge. The respondent as the plaintiff filed Money Suit No. 58/2003 in the court of the then Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Tinsukia against the petitioners as defendants for recovery of Rs. 1,45,019.00, further interest on the decreetal amount @ 24% per annum from 21.9.2003 till recovery alongwith cost. The summons were duly served on the defendants petitioners but as they failed to appear and contest, the suit was decreed ex-parte. The said decree was put to execution which was transferred to the court of learned Civil Judge, Dibrugarh for execution as the defendants petitioners are carrying on business within the jurisdiction of the court under Dibrugarh district.

3. The execution proceeding was initiated by the decree holder respondent upon which Money Execution Case No. 2/2007 was registered i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top