JUDGMENT :

Rumi Kumari Phukan, J.

Heard Mr. SC Biswas, learned counsel appearing for and on behalf of the petitioner as well as Mr. M.H. Rajbarbhuiyan, learned counsel representing the respondent.

2. By way of this present application, the petitioner has sought for quashing of the complaint case No.744/2013 pending before the learned Additional CJM, Karimganj taking cognizance under Section 406/420/506 of IPC.

3. The case in brief of the petitioner, is that that the respondent No.2 /Ujjal Kanti Chanda, who was his business associate has filed the aforesaid complaint case on 05.02.2013 before the learned CJM, Karimganj alleging that on the approach made by the petitioner to set up a sub-service centre at Karimganj under his authorized service centre namely, M/s Global Technologies and his assurance that he has the authority to set up such sub-service centre, the complainant respondent provided him Rs.2,17,000/- as asked by the petitioner to be required for providing tools and machineries etc.. The complainant accordingly started Samsung sub-service centre by entering into a bilateral agreement dated 01.04.2012, whereby the petitioner made the complainant a SIS Service Provider entrustin