ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI
Abdul Hye – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. J. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.K. Ghosh, learned standing counsel, Education (Secondary) Department, appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 and Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned senior counsel, appearing for the respondent No. 7. None had appeared for the respondent Nos. 5 and 6, though the names of the learned counsel are shown in the cause-list. None had appeared for the respondent No. 3 as well.
2. This writ petition was listed together along with WP (C) Nos. 2014/2016 and 1168/2016 and also was initially heard together. However, later on, this case was de-linked and heard separately.
3. By this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari to set aside and quash the select list dated 3.2.2016 (wrongly written as 3.1.2016), whereby the respondent No. 7 was selected for the post of Lower Division Assistant (LDA) of Rupahi Higher Secondary School and for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to select the petitioner for the aforesaid post of LDA.
4. The case of the petitioner, as projected in the wri
Dr. G. Sarana vs. University of Lucknow
J&K Public Service Commission vs. Dr. Narinder Mohan
Madan Lai vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Monish Kumar Shahi vs. State of Bihar
Om Prakash Shukla vs. Akhilesh Kumar Shukla
Ramesh Chandra Shah vs. Anil Joshi
Sadananda Halo vs. Momtaz Ali Sheikh
Vijendra Kumar Verma vs. Public Service Commission, Uttarakhand
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.