RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
M. L. Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. As both appeals arose from the same judgment in Special Case 165/2004 they are
taken up together and being disposed with this common judgment.
Heard Mr. D.S. Choudhury, learned counsel for the appellants in Crl. Appeal 313/2014 and Mr. A.K. Das, learned counsel for the appellant in Crl. Appeal 330/2014.
Also heard Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned standing counsel, CBI,
2. During 1995-96 the Department of Telecommunications (‘DoT’), Government of India, decided to provide Optical Fibre Cable (‘OFC’) Communication link on Imphal-Moreh route in the State of Manipur. A survey of the route was conducted; a Project Estimate was prepared and sanctioned. The total route length of the section is 108 kms. which was divided into 27 sub-sections of 4 kms. length each. The tenders were invited and the work was executed through contractors separately for each sub-section. The terms, conditions and specifications of work are mentioned in the tender document. The agreement was executed with the successful contractors. The over-all in-charge of the work was Divisional Engineer (DE) and the Government is represented by him. The Sub-Divisional Engineer represents the Government at the site of work. T
Abdullah Mohammad Pagarkar, etc. v. State (Union Territory of Goa Daman Dieu)
Ganesh K. Gulve v. State of Maharashtra
Ghulam Din Buck v. State of J&K
LIC of India v. Ratnpal Singh Bisen
Sait. T. Khimsand v. Yelamarti Satyam
Subash Parbat Sonvane v. State of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.