SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Gau) 516

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
En-geo Consultancy And Research Centre – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
F. Sattar, Advocate, S.C. Keyal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, J. - Heard Mr. A. Sattar, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. S.C Keyal, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The appellants instituted Money Suit No.106/2007 in the Court of the learned Civil Judge No.2, Kamrup, Guwahati for a decree amounting to a total of Rs.19,61,124/- under four different heads as stated in the prayer itself with a further decree for interest pendent life as well as future interest till realization of the claimed amount of Rs.19,61,124/-.

3. In course of the trial, the following issues were framed:-

wxyz

(1) Whether there is any cause of action of the suit land?

zyxw

wxyz

(2) Whether the suit is maintainable?

zyxw

wxyz

(3) Whether the suit of the plaintiff ix bad for non-joinder of the Union of India as a principal defendant?

zyxw

wxyz

(4) Whether the plaintiff are entitled to any money is prayed for under the agreement dated 22/2/05?

zyxw

wxyz

(5) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the amount claimed in the suit?

zyxw

wxyz

(6) Whether the defendants are entitled to compensatory cost?

zyxw

wxyz

(7) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to any relief/reliefs as prayed for?

zyxw

wxyz

(8) What other relief/reliefs parties are entitled

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top