SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Gau) 547

NELSON SAILO
State Of Mizoram – Appellant
Versus
Vanthangliana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mary L Khiangte, Advocate, L.H. Lianhrima, Advocate, Ruth Lalruatfeli, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Nelson Sailo, J. - Heard Ms. Mary L. Khiangte, the learned Government Advocate for the appellants/defendant Nos. 1 to 4 (State defendants) and Mr. L.H. Lianhrima, the learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Ruth Lalruatfeli for the respondent No.1/plaintiff (plaintiff). None appears for the respondent Nos.2 to 38/defendant Nos.5 to 41 (private defendants) despite notice.

2. This is an appeal filed by the State defendants against the Judgment and Order dated 17.06.2008 passed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Aizawl District, Aizawl in Title Suit No.2 of 1995, whereby the Suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiff. The operative portion of the impugned Judgment and Order is abstracted below-

wxyz

"22. Therefore, it is ordered and decreed that the Permit No. 192 of 1965 is a permanent one and the plaintiff is entitled to get rental compensation from the defendants nos.1 to 4 for dispossessing the plaintiff and accommodating the defendants nos.5 to 41. The rental compensation to be paid to the plaintiff is to be assessed by the Deputy Commissioner, Aizawl District. The defendants nos.1 to 4 are ordered to evict the defendants nos.5 to 41 from the land of the plaintiff and giv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top