SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 1255

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
SONGKHUPCHUNG SERTO, MANISH CHOUDHURY, JJ.
State of Nagaland and Others - Appellants
Versus
Chubanungsang Imchen - Respondent
WA Nos. 5 and 6 of 2019
Decided on : 9-10-2019

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. V. Suokhrie for the appellants.
Mr. A. Zho for the respondent.

Headnote:

Nagaland Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1967 – Rule 6 – Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Section 13 – Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 409, 420, 120B, 477A – Code of Criminal Procedure – Section 173 – Suspension – Writ appeals are preferred against the common judgment and order passed by Single Judge in WP(C) and WP(C) – By the said common judgment and order Single Judge has set aside the orders, passed by the Chief Secretary to the Government of Nagaland, whereby, the petitioners therein, i.e., the respondents herein were placed under suspension with immediate effect in exercise of powers conferred under rule 6(1)(a) of the Nagaland Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1967 – Held, There is no whisper in the affidavits-in-opposition filed by the appellants herein as the respondents, in the writ petitions to the effect that there was any attempt on the part of the respondents to interfere in the process of collection of evidence or to temper with the evidence or to influence the witnesses in any manner – There is no indication in the charge sheet that any further investigation is necessary to unearth any further materials – Court is of the considered view that the learned Single Judge is not unjustified in reaching the ultimate conclusion that the period of suspension of the respondents in absence of any reasoned order passed in review, cannot be prolonged and, therefore, is justified in setting aside the orders of suspension in respect of both the respondents – Court do not find any merit in the appeals and accordingly, the same are dismissed – Appeal Dismissed

JUDGMENT :

MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.:— Heard Ms. V. Suokhrie, learned State counsel for the appellants and Mr. A. Zho, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent.

2. These two writ appeals are preferred against the common judgment and order dated 19.3.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 184(K)/2018 and WP(C) No. 185(K)/2018. By the said common judgment and order dated 19.3.2019, the learned Single Judge has set aside the orders, both dated 6.10.2017, passed by the Chief Secretary to the Government of Nagaland, whereby, the petitioners therein, i.e., the respondents herein were placed under suspension with immediate effect in exercise of powers conferred under rule 6(1)(a) of the Nagaland Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1967 (‘the Rules of 1967’).

3. The background facts, in brief, leading to the institution of the writ petitions are stated hereunder:

(i) The respondent in WA No. 5/2019, i.e., the petitioner in WP(C) No. 184 (K)/2018, was serving as a Joint Director in the Department of School Education, Nagaland, Kohima. While the respondent was so serving, he was given additional charge to look after the project of Inclusive Education of Disabled Students at the Secondary Stage (IEDSS) as Project Director during 2011-15.

(ii) The respondent in WA No. 6/2019, i.e., the petitioner in WP(C) No. 185(K)/2018, was serving as a Joint Education Officer (JEO), attached to RMSA, in the Department of School Education, Nagaland, Kohima. While the respondent was so serving, he was also given the additional charge to look after the project of IEDSS as Assistant Project Officer during 2011-2015.

(iii) Alleging irregularities in implementation of the said IEDSS project, a written complaint dated 31.8.2014 came to be filed before the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Kohima against the School Education Department by a Dy. SP (Vigilance) of the said Department. Based on the said complaint, a Special Investigation Team was constituted and a regular case being Regular Case No. 1/2015 was registered, on 20.2.2015, under section 409/420/120B/477A, Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) read with section 13(1)(c)(cl) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (‘the P.C. Act’) against the departmental officers including the respondents herein. Pursuant to the registration of said vigilance case, investigation was initiated and a charge sheet was stated to have been submitted, about which would be referred to in the subsequent paragraphs.

(iv) Thereafter, on 6.10.2017, the Chief Secretary to the Government of Nagaland passed the impugned orders placing the respondents in the present appeals under suspension, exercising powers under the provisions of rule 6(1)(a) of the Rules of 1967. The said order of suspension passed in respect of the respondent in W.A. No. 5/2019 is quoted here under:—

“GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND

DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION ORDER

Dated Kohima, the 6th October, 2017

NO. DSE/CSS/IEDSS/2-4/2015(Pt): Whereas a case against Dr. Chubanungsang, Joint Director School Education in respect of criminal offence is under investigation/inquiry/trial.

Now, therefore, the Governor in exercise of the powers conferred under rule 6(1)(a) of the Nagaland Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,1967 of Nagaland is pleased to order the suspension of Dr. Chubanungsang, Joint Director, School Education with immediate effect. It is further ordered that during the period that this order shall remain in force, the headquarters of Dr. Chubanungsang, Joint Director, School Education shall be Kohima and the said Dr. Chubanungsang, Joint Director, School Education shall not leave the headquarters without obtaining the previous permission of the competent authority.

During the period of suspension, Dr. Chubanungsang, Joint Director, School Education, Nagaland Kohima shall be entitled to a subsistence allowance at an amount of equal to the leave salary which he would have drawn under the leave rules applicable to him if he had been on leave or half average pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top