IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
Md. Narul Hoque Laskar, S/o. Lt. Tawakul Ali Ladkara and 5 Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of Assam and 5 Ors., Rep. by The Comm. and Secy. to the Govt. of Assam, Health and Family Welfare Deptt. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 235 of 2017, WP(C) No. 1408 of 2017, WP(C) No.7886 of 2016, WP(C) No. 7703 of 2016, WP(C) No. 7706 of 2016, WP(C) No. 1414 of 2017, WP(C) No. 1283 of 2017, WP(C) No. 7704 of /2016, WP(C) No. 7705 of 2016, WP(C) No. 7879 of 2016
Decided On : 09-03-2021
Service Matter - Violation of the principles of natural justice – Orders of reversion from Store Keeper/LDA or any other equivalent posts to the post of Surveillance Worker under the Health and Family Welfare Department, Assam – Challenged
Finding of the Court:
Since the regular process of appointment to the rank of Store Keeper / LDA is prescribed in the Rules and the petitioners not being borne in the said cadre of Store Keeper / LDA by undergoing the aforesaid recruitment process, no right, whatsoever has accrued upon them to claim continuance in the said post of Store Keeper / LDA - petitioners have not been able to make out any case for interference by this Court in exercise of its extra ordinary powers. It is, however, directed that none of the petitioners should be deprived of their seniority from their original dates of their posting as SW / BHW and such seniority be restored on the date from which the petitioners would render service in the substantial post of SW / BHW
Result: Writ petition dismissed
JUDGMENT :
The subject matter of all the writ petitions being similar, the same are taken up together for disposal by this common judgment and order.
2. In this set of writ petitions, challenge has been made to the orders of reversion from Store Keeper/LDA or any other equivalent posts to the post of Surveillance Worker under the Health and Family Welfare Department, Assam. The petitioners have taken various grounds of challenge, including violation of the principles of natural justice before passing the impugned orders which, according to them, have adverse consequences. However, before coming to the issue at hand, it would be convenient to state the basic facts of each of the cases.
3. The petitioner, Shri Manoj Das in WP(C) No.7703/2016 was initially appointed as a Surveillance Worker (hereinafter referred to as the SW) vide appointment letter dated 26.05.1998 issued by the Joint Director of Health Services. During the tenure of his services, he had obtained his diploma in type writing (both in English and Assamese). Since a post of Store Keeper was lying vacant, the petitioner made a prayer for upgrading his services as Store Keeper. It is the case of the petitioner that his post of SW was subsequently designated as Store Keeper in the same scale of pay vide an order dated 05.05.2008 issued by the Addl. Director of Health Services, Assam. The petitioner was thereafter transferred to Barpeta vide an order dated 19.03.2013. Since then, the petitioner claims to be continuously working as LDA. However, by the impugned orders dated 30.11.2016 and 12.12.2016, the petitioner along with other incumbents were reverted back to the post of SW. It is the case of the petitioner that neither any reasons were assigned for such reversion nor he was given any opportunity or notice.
4. The petitioner, Shri Jitumoni Kalita in WP(C) No.7704/2016 was initially appointed as a SW vide appointment letter dated 17.12.2005 issued by the Director of Health Services, Assam. During the tenure of his services, he had obtained qualification in computer and had also completed his M.Sc. in Information and Technology. It is the case of the petitioner that his post of SW was subsequently designated as Store Keeper in the same scale of pay vide an order dated 04.06.2013 issued by the authorities. Since then, the petitioner claims to be continuously working as LDA. However, by the impugned orders dated 30.11.2016 and 12.12.2016, the petitioner along with other incumbents were reverted back to the post of SW. It is the case of the petitioner that neither any reasons were assigned for such reversion nor the petitioner was given any opportunity or notice.
5. The petitioner, Ms. Syeda Jurima Ahmeda in WP(C) No.7705/2016 was initially appointed as a SW vide appointment letter dated 11.04.2008 issued by the Director of Health Services, Assam. During the tenure of her services, she was deputed to the office of the District Malaria Officer, Barpeta in the leave vacancy of an LDA. The said post was subsequently designated as LDA in the same scale of pay vide an order dated 25.01.2010 issued by the authorities. Since then, the petitioner claims to be continuously working as LDA. However, by the impugned orders dated 30.11.2016 and 12.12.2016, the petitioner along with other incumbents were reverted back to the post of SW. It is the case of the petitioner that neither any reasons were assigned for such reversion nor the petitioner was given any opportunity or notice.
6. The petitioner, Md. Abedul Haque in WP(C) No.7706/2016 was initially appointed as a Basic Health Worker (hereinafter referred to as the BHW) vide appointment letter dated 06.05.1995 issued by the District Malaria Officer, Nalbari. It is the case of the petitioner that his post of BHW was subsequently designated as Store Keeper in the same scale of pay vide an order dated 28.06.2006 issued by the Joint Director of Health Services, Assam. In the meantime, the petitioner also served as Nodal Officer, NRC Cell, Na
Balbir Singh Vs. State of HP & Ors.
S. Sumnyan Vs. Limi Niri & Ors.
Himadri Das & Anr. Vs. State of Assam
Rubu Opo Vs. State of AP & Ors.
Shri Mengutuo Kense & Ors. Vs. State of Nagaland & Ors.
State of Orissa and Ors. Vs. Mamata Mohanty
Dilip Talukdar and Ors. Vs. State of Assam and Ors. (DB)
Aligarh Muslim University & Ors. Vs. Mansoor Ali Khan
K.L. Tripathi Vs. State Bank of India
State Bank of Patiala Vs. S.K. Sharma
Rajendra Singh Vs. State of M.P.
Chandigarh Administration and Anr. v. Jagjit Singh and Anr.
Yogesh Kumar and Ors. v. Government of NCT Delhi and Ors.
Anand Buttons Ltd. etc. v. State of Haryana and Ors.
KK Bhalla v. State of MP and Ors.
Maharaj Krishan Bhatt and Anr. v. State of Jammu & Kashmir and Ors.
Union of India and Anr. v. Kartick Chandra Mondal and Anr.
Hotel Balaji and Ors. v. State of AP and Ors.
In Re : Sanjiv Datta, Dy. Secy., Ministry of Information & Broadcasting
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.