SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 144

SONGKHUPCHUNG SERTO
Geeta Mihu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rintu Saikia, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Songkhupchung Serto, J. - Heard Mr. R. Saikia, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also heard Mr. K. Ete, learned Sr. Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents No. 3 assisted by Ms. G. Ete, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate, Mr. D. Kamduk, learned Standing counsel, Land Management department appearing on behalf of the respondents No. 1 & 2 and Mr. M. Kato, learned ASGI appearing for the respondents No. 4 to 8.

2. The facts and circumstances which led to the filing of this writ petition are briefly stated as follows;

2.1. Vide letter dated 18.02.2010, the Colonel, Headquarters, 2 Mountain Division requested the Commissioner, Land Management, Government of Arunachal Pradesh for acquisition of land measuring 105.14 acres at Dibang Valley District for the purpose of accommodating Army units, logistic bases etc. Accordingly, the Commissioner (Land Management), Government of Arunachal Pradesh directed the Deputy Commissioner, Dibang Valley at Anini, vide his letter No. LM-36/2010/938, dated 16.08.2010 to submit a proposal. Thereafter, the Director, Land Management, Government of Arunachal Pradesh vide his letter No. LM-36/2010/3433, dated 20.03.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top