SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 187

MANISH CHOUDHURY
Bahnisikha Dutta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P. Borah, Advocate, M.R. Adhikary, Advocate, P. Nayak, Advocate, C. Baruah, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manish Choudhury, J. - By this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondent authorities for disbursement of her retirement benefits which the respondent authorities stated to have been withhold.

2. The background facts, in brief, which are necessary for the purpose adjudication of this writ petition are exposited as follows : the petitioner was a member of the Assam Civil Service (ACS) and she retired from service on 28.02.2013 on reaching the age of superannuation from the post of Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in the Cachar Zilla Parashid.

2.1. After the retirement of the petitioner on 28.02.2013, two criminal cases -Silchar Police Station Case no. 714/2013 and Silchar Police Case no. 776/2013 came to be registered in Silchar Police Station wherein the petitioner was named as one of the accused persons. Both the cases were registered on the basis of First Information Report (FIR)/complaint lodged by two different private persons.

2.2. One Sri Fokrul Islam Laskar, representing himself to be the General Secretary of a registered NGO filed a complaint before the learned Chi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top