SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 170

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Suman Shyam, Mir Alfaz Ali, JJ.
Raizuddin Ahmed @ Md Riazuddin Sheikh And Ors - Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam And Anr - Respondent
Crl A No. 300 of 2017, 318 of 2017
Decided On : 15-03-2021

Advocates Appeared:
A. Ahmed, Advocate, M. Phukan, Advocate, R.B. Deb, Advocate, D. Talukdar, Advocate

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 147, 341, 323, 307, 302 with Section 149 - Unlawful assembly - Conviction of appellants for murder and attempted murder in a planned attack involving multiple assailants using lethal weapons, leading to the death of the victim - The trial court found the eyewitness testimonies credible, despite challenges from the defence regarding the investigation which included a delayed FIR. (Paras 2, 5, 35, 56)

Facts of the case:
The incident occurred on 8th July 2008 when the victim Abdul Wahab was ambushed and killed by the accused who laid wires on the road to cause a fall. The attack was executed using swords and other lethal weapons. (Paras 4, 60)

Findings of Court:
The trial court established guilt based on the accounts of five eyewitnesses, whose statements were corroborated by the investigating officer. The evidence showed premeditation and a common object to kill, as supported by the nature and number of injuries inflicted on the victim. (Paras 34, 56)

Issues: Whether the witnesses provided credible accounts, and whether the investigation lapses impacted the prosecution's case. (Paras 27, 40)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that minor lapses in the investigation do not undermine strong direct evidence from eyewitnesses. The defined roles of the accused in the attack established a common object essential for the application of Section 149 IPC. (Paras 35, 51)

Result: Criminal Appeal No. 300/2017 dismissed; Criminal Appeal No. 318/2017 granted partly, with appellant Sattar Ali acquitted. (Paras 60, 61)

Table of Content
1. overview of the incidents leading to the case (Para 2 , 4 , 5)
2. witness testimonies establish sequence of events (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. arguments challenging the credibility of witness accounts (Para 27 , 28 , 31 , 32 , 36)
4. evaluation of witness credibility and evidence (Para 33 , 49 , 56)
5. final ruling and conclusion of the court (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63)

JUDGMENT

Suman Shyam, J. - Heard Mr. H.R.A.Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the appellants in Crl. Appeal No.300/2017. We have also heard Mr. B. M. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the appellants in Crl. Appeal No.318/2017. Mr. M. Phukan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, is present on behalf of the State in both the appeals. None has appeared for the informant.

2. The aforementioned appeals arise out of the judgment and order dated 16.06.2017 passed by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Goalpara in connection with Sessions Case No.223/2012. There were 16 charge-sheeted accused persons out of which, one accused viz., Md. Abdus Sattar Ahmed died. The remaining 15 accused persons had faced trial. By the judgment and order dated 16.06.2017 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Goalpara, the 10 appellants in Criminal Appeal No.300/2017 and the 2 appellants in Criminal Appeal No.318/2017 had been convicted under Sections 147 /341/323/307/302 read with Section 149 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE . Accordingly, the learned Sessions Judge, Goalpara had sentenced the accused persons, viz., Yousuf , Raijuddin @ Raju, Saizuddin, Sher Ali, Amir Ali, Sattar Ali, Abdus Salam, Abdul Hai @ Dillar, Taher Ali @ Guddu, Mirazul, Sadek Ali & Sayed to suffer simple imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 147 of IPC; to suffer simple imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 341 of IPC; to suffer simple imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 323 of IPC; to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- each and in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for a year for the offence under Section 302 of IPC and also to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.3000/- each and in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 307 of IPC. All the sentences were to run concurrently. The accused persons were acquitted in respect of the charge under Section 326 of IPC.

3. The other three accused persons viz., Ramjan Ali, Lalchand Ali and Gole Rahman were, however, honourably acquitted from all the charges on the ground that the prosecution had failed to implicate them with the offences alleged.

4. The prosecution story, briefly stated, is to the effect that on 08.07.2008 at around 8.30 p.m. while the deceased Abdul Wahab was returning home from Karbala Bazar, riding a motorcycle, accompanied by five other persons, the accused persons had laid an ambush in a secluded place in the Gobindapur Rabhapara PWD road by tying three thick wires to a mango tree with an intention to kill the deceased. As soon as the deceased Abdul Wahab and his companions reached the place of occurrence in four motor bikes, the accused persons had pulled the wires causing the first bike to fall down and thereafter, launched a sudden attack on Abdul Wahab by means of deadly weapons such as sword, dao, axe, spear etc. Before attacking him with sharp weapons, one of the accused persons had also sprayed chilli power in the eyes of the victim. Due to the multiple injuries sustained on his person, Abdul Wahab died on the spot and Omar Ali, his son-in-law, also sustained grievous injuries.

5. On 10.07.2008 Md. Najmul Haque had lodged an ejahar before the Officer-in-Charge, Goalpara Police Station reporting the incident with a request to arrest the 13 accused persons including the appellants named therein. Based on the ejahar dated 10.07.2008, Goalpara P.S. Case No.210/08 was registered under Sections 147 /34

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top