SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 161

N.KOTISWAR SINGH, SOUMITRA SAIKIA
Anan Nayak @ Papu Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Arunangshu Dhar, Advocate, B. Bhuyan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

N. Kotiswar Singh, J. - Heard Mr. A. Dhar, learned amicus curiae for the appellants. Also heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent.

2. These 2 (two) jail appeals have been preferred against the common judgment and order dated 22.12.2017 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh in Sessions Case No.148/2014 (G.R. Case No.1086/2014) by which the appellants were found guilty under Section 302/34 IPC and sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- only each, in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) month each. The appellants were also convicted under Sections 341/34 IPC and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) months. Both the sentences are to run concurrently.

3. The brief facts of the case as unfolded in course of the trial was that an FIR was lodged on 30.04.2014 by one Smt. Sita Lohar, wife of the deceased late Dilip Lohar, stating that at 2.30 P.M. on 30.04.2014 Sri Anan Nayak @ Pappu Nayak and Mangra Nayak, appellants herein, both residents of Maijar Pathartoli Line, confronted her husband Dilip Lohar on the road of Pathartoli Line. The appella

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top