SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 349

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
Kusumpur Pakaria Matchyajibi S.S. Ltd. & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Assam, represented by the Principal Secretary, to the Government of Assam, Fishery Department & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 2477 of 2021 With WP(C) No. 763 of 2021
Decided On : 09-09-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. K.N. Choudhury, Senior Advocate, Mr. R.M. Deka, Advocate, Mr. T.J. Mahanta, Senior Advocate, Mr. P.P. Dutta, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. K. Goswami, Additional Senior Government Advocate, Mr. M.K. Choudhury, Senior Advocate, Mr. P. Bharadwaj, Advocate.

Point of Law: Order of settlement - Tender Process - The only other valid bidder, Society did not challenge order of settlement - In view of such position, assailment made on aspect of neighbourhood by two petitioners herein whose bids met fate of disqualification, which in the considered view of this Court are on valid grounds, should fail and cannot be countenanced.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Assam Fishery Rules, 1953 - Assam Fishery Rules, 1953 - Notice - Tender - Bids - Whether condition and requirements of neighbourhood, as prescribed under Fishery Rules, was present in mind of settling authority or not - By a Notice Inviting Tender Deputy Commissioner invited sealed bids for settlement of Morisuti Fishery for a period of 7 [seven] years from date of settlement by Fishery Department - Said NIT mentioned that sealed bids would be received in office of Deputy Commissioner - As per terms and conditions of NIT, a number of documents were required to be submitted along with sealed bid. Amongst certificates/documents which were required to be submitted along with sealed bid by a bidder documents issued by Income Tax Department, were included - NIT had further prescribed that 15% of minimum annual revenue fixed by Government for 1st year had to be deposited by bidder as security deposit in form of call deposit.

Finding of the Court: In a tender process initiated by a notice inviting tender, it is terms and conditions of notice which govern the matter of qualification or disqualification of a participating bidder. Where a decision is taken by the tendering authority in consonance with terms and conditions of the notice or sub-serves the purpose for which the tender process is initiated and if decision making process adopted by the tendering authority is not found fraught with any element of arbitrariness, biasness or discriminatory treatment or is not against any public interest the Court in its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India should refrain from making any interference. In light of above discussion made in respect of the tender process in question, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order of settlement. The grounds on which the bids of two petitioner societies were rejected, by the impugned order of settlement, cannot be termed as arbitrary or irrational. The Morisuti Fishery has been settled in favour of a bidder i.e. the respondent society whose bid was found in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth in the NIT.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

In both the writ petitions, W.P.(C) No. 763/2021 and W.P.(C) No. 2477/2021, preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the subject-matter of challenge is an order of settlement dated 22.01.2021, whereby, No. 38 Morisuti Fishery in Morigaon District [‘the Morisuti Fishery’, for short] has been settled with the respondent M/s 129 No. Haria Dablang Meen Samabai Samity Ltd. [‘the respondent society’, for short], impleaded as respondent no. 5 and the respondent no. 6 respectively in the two writ petitions, for a period of 7 [seven] years at its offered bid value of Rs. 38,85,000/- i.e. Rs. 5,55,000/- per annum w.e.f. the date of handing over possession of the Morisuti Fishery, subject to observance of all required formalities as laid down in the Assam Fishery Rules, 1953, as amended [‘the Fishery Rules’, for short]. By the same order of settlement dated 22.01.2021, the settling authority has declared both the bids submitted by the two writ petitioners, both registered cooperative societies, as non-compliant to the Notice Inviting Tender dated 02.01.2020.

2. For appreciation of the issues raised in these two writ petitions, it may be useful to state the background facts, in brief, sans the unnecessary details. By a Notice Inviting Tender [‘NIT’, for short] dated 02.01.2020, the Deputy Commissioner, Morigaon invited sealed bids for settlement of the Morisuti Fishery for a period of 7 [seven] years from the date of settlement by the Fishery Department. The said NIT mentioned that the sealed bids would be received in the office of the Deputy Commissioner, Morigaon upto 02-00 p.m. on 20.01.2020. As per the terms and conditions of the NIT, a number of documents were required to be submitted along with the sealed bid. Amongst the certificates/documents which were required to be submitted along with the sealed bid by a bidder the documents viz. (a) fishing experience certificate; (b) bakijai clearance certificate from the Deputy Commissioner; (c) photocopy of PAN card issued by the Income Tax Department, were included. The NIT had further prescribed that 15% of the minimum annual revenue fixed by the Government for the 1st year had to be deposited by the bidder as security deposit in the form of call deposit.

3. In response to the NIT, 6 [six] nos. of bidders, all registered societies, had submitted their bids quoting different bid values in total as well as year-wise. After expiry of the time of submission of the bid, the bids were opened. After organizing the tender papers submitted by all the participating bidders, the Tender Committee, constituted by the Deputy Commissioner, Morigaon, scrutinized the same. After scrutinization, a comparative statement was prepared by the Tender Committee keeping in view the terms and conditions of the NIT dated 02.01.2020. A chart of the bid values, offered by the participating bidders in descending order, was also prepared. The bid values quoted by the 6 [six] participating bidders were found as under :-

 

Participating bidders

Bid value

1.

M/s 36/38 Tepari Sonai Morisuti Meen S.S. Ltd.

Rs. 53,27,000/-

2.

M/s Kusumpur Pakaria Matshya Jibi S.S. Ltd.

Rs. 42,17,850/-

3.

M/s 129 No. Hariya Dablong Meen S.S. Ltd.

Rs. 38,85,000/-

4.

M/s Pakoriduba Matshya Jibi S.S. Ltd.

Rs. 36,80,000/-

5.

M/s Katahguri Meen S.S. Ltd.

Rs. 35,78,435/-

6.

M/s Beramari Meen S.S. Ltd.

Rs. 31,88,675/-

4. The Tender Committee besides mentioning the offered bid values, scrutinized the certificates/documents directed to be submitted with the bid as per Clause no. 4 of the NIT and made their remarks in respect of each of such certificates/documents in the respective columns in the comparative statement. The tender papers along with the comparative statement, were thereafter, forwarded by the Deputy Commissioner, Morigaon to the State Government by a let

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top