This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 19.7.96 as passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Civil Rule No. 1178 of 1995 thereby setting aside the order dated 12.1.1995 filed as Annexure H to the writ petition and as Annexure A to this appeal. It was this order which was the subject matter of challenge before the learned Single Judge and as has been rightly noted by the learned Single Judge in the opening sentence of his judgment "the only question involved in this writ petition is as to whether the petitioner received a fair consideration! of his case before the administrative authority in the matter of distribution of State largesse."

2. Since the whole argument advanced before us veers round this order dated 12.1.95, Annexure H and submissions based on microscopic view of the minutest factual details have been made. It would not be out of place to reproduced the order itself not only as a ready reference, but it would also facilitate better appreciation of facts :

“No.Fish.l04/84/211 dated Dispur, the 12th Jan' 95.

ORDERS BY THE GOVERNOR

Matter relating to settlement of No.49/51-Patuakata/Chalakata/Bhaluakata/ Morsonai Group Fishery.

Read : (1)