HITESH KUMAR SARMA
Arjun Agrawal @ Arjun Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Represented by the Customs Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This criminal petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Cr.PC seeking quashment of Customs case No. 05/CL/IMP/CUS/CPF/NML/2020-2021 dated 15.03.2021 pending in the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Golaghat.
2. Heard Mr. D Saikia, learned senior counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. SC Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, respondent/Customs Department.
3. The fact of the case is that on 14.03.2021, at about 23:30 hours (11:30 pm), a flying squad from Ghiladhari Police Station recovered 8 (eight) silvery marmosets, 2 (two) golden headed lion tamarins and 2 (two) lutino blue and gold macaws from a Scorpio vehicle bearing registration No. AS-01/EA-4707 travelling from Merapani to Golaghat. The three accused persons/petitioners herein, upon interrogation, stated that the exotic animals and birds so recovered were collected from Imphal, Manipur and were being taken to Chennai. On 15.03.2021, the Officer-In-Charge, Ghiladhari Police Station, Golaghat handed over the detected items, i.e., the recovered animals and birds and the vehicle along with the accused persons/petitioners to the Range Forest Officer, Jamuguri Range, Golaghat who in turn informed that t
Om Prakash Bhatia vs. Commissioner of Customs, Delhi
Sheikh Mohd. Omer v. Collector of Customs, Calcutta and Others
None.
The provided case law does not contain any language indicating that it has been overruled, reversed, criticized, or otherwise treated as bad law. The case law appears to be a standalone statement without references to subsequent judicial treatment.
Followed / Unspecified Treatment:
The case law states a principle regarding violations related to export value and over-invoicing, but there is no indication that this ruling has been questioned, distinguished, or overruled in later decisions. It appears to be an authoritative statement on the issue without subsequent judicial treatment noted.
Explanation: The absence of treatment indicators such as "overruled," "criticized," or "distinguished" suggests it remains a valid legal reference.
Uncertain Cases:
None identified.
The case law provided does not contain ambiguous language or references to treatment patterns, so all treatment is presumed to be neutral or unaltered.
**Source :** Om Prakas Bhatia VS Commissioner Of Customs, Delhi - Supreme Court Sheikh Mohd. Omer VS Collector Of Customs, Calcutta - Supreme Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.