SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Sudhanshu Dhulia, Soumitra Saikia, JJ.
Md. Imad Uddin Barbhuiya and ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Assam, to be represented by the Principal Secretary to the Government of Assam, Education (Secondary) Department and ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (C) NO.3038 of 2021
Decided On : 04-02-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sanjay Hegde, Senior Advocate, Mr. A.R. Bhuyan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. D. Saikia, Advocate General, Ms. P. Chakraborty, SC

Point of Law : Income from affiliation fees and the examination fees as the term 'fee' itself indicates something that is charged for rendering the service in respect of those two items which is a sort of quid pro quo and could hardly be said to be an income for the purposes of running the University.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 – Article 14,21,25,26,29, 30 and 309 - Assam Madrassa Education (Provincialization) Act, 1995 - Section 2(k) - Educational institution - Right to establish and administer educational institutions - This writ petition throws a challenge to legislative as well as executive decisions of State of Assam, which have been taken in recent past - By these recent legislative and executive decisions, religious instructions, which were so far being imparted in “provincialized Madrasas” of State, have come to an end - Petitioners’ case is that this action of State Government amounts to an invasion of their fundamental rights given to them under Articles 25 and 26 as well as under Articles 29 and 30 of Constitution of India - It has further been argued that this is also violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India - Generally in the late 19th and first half of 20th Century, Government schools were opened which imparted, inter alia, modern education in languages, humanities and sciences - Yet these schools were few and far between - All parts of Assam could not be reached, due to logistical and financial constraints - Local communities thus came forward to establish private schools in Assam - These were called “Venture Schools” - There were venture Madrasas as well, where largely religious education was imparted - Whether based on religion or language, shall have right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice” has been violated–

Finding of the Court:

Court must reiterate that secularism is a basic feature of our Constitution and Article 28(1) is nothing but a strong assertion of our secular principles - Court say this for the reason that their counterparts, who were teaching in ‘Sanskrit Tolls’ have been placed under a University, after abolition of ‘Sanskrit Tolls’ – Court direct that if such teachers in Arabic Colleges and Title Madrasas, who were so far imparting education to students at Graduate and Post-Graduate levels, their case shall also be considered for bringing under a University, like it has been done for teachers in Sanskrit Tolls - But as the teachers are not before court, this shall be subject to a representation being made by such teachers, before Commissioner and Secretary, Education (Secondary) Department, which shall then be considered in terms of our observations, by passing a speaking order - Court uphold the validity of Assam Repealing Act, 2020 and subsequent executive orders and communications of Government, referred in court judgment.

Result: Writ petition dismissed

JUDGMENT :

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.

This writ petition throws a challenge to the legislative as well as executive decisions of the State of Assam, which have been taken in the recent past. By these recent legislative and executive decisions, religious instructions, which were so far being imparted in the “provincialised Madrasas” of the State, have come to an end. Petitioners’ case is that this action of the State Government amounts to an invasion of their fundamental rights given to them under Articles 25 and 26 as well as under Articles 29 and 30 of the Constitution of India. It has further been argued that this is also violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

2. Before we deal with this question, a brief history of secondary and higher secondary education in Assam would be in order.

3. Prior to the introduction of modern education in Assam, school level education was largely a community driven effort. “Maktabs” and “Madrasas” were opened in various places in Assam by members of Muslim community to give the kind of education to children, the community thought would be in their best interest.

4. Generally in the late 19th and first half of 20th Century, Government schools were opened which imparted, inter alia, modern education in languages, humanities and sciences. Yet these schools were few and far between. All parts of Assam could not be reached, due to logistical and financial constraints. Local communities thus came forward to establish private schools in Assam. These were called “Venture Schools”. There were venture Madrasas as well, where largely religious education was imparted. Later, these schools, both venture schools and venture Madrasas, or at least a large number of them, started getting financial support from the Government under a scheme known as “deficit financing”. Gradually, some of these schools under deficit finance scheme were “provincialised”. The Assam Secondary Education (Provincialisation) Act, 1977 provincialised many such schools which were under deficit scheme and the teaching and non-teaching staffs of these schools became Government servants. A similar move was made by the Government later in the year 1995 to provincialise such venture Madrasas, which were under the deficit finance scheme. A total number of 74 Madrasas, which were till now under the deficit scheme, were provincialised under the 1995 provincialised Act, which is known as the Assam Madrassa Education (Provincialisation) Act, 1995. This happened in the year 1995-96 and the teaching as well as non-teaching staff of these Madrasas which were now provincialised, became Government servants. After the 1995 Provincialisation Act, the State came up with another Provincialisation Act, i.e. Assam Venture Madrassa Educational Institutions (Provincialisation of Services) Act, 2011, which was amended in the years 2013 and 2014, under which some more Madrasas were provincialised and then came the Assam Madrassa Education (Provincialisation of Services of Employees and Re-organisation of Madrassa Educational Institutions) Act, 2018, which repealed the 2011 Madrassa Provincialisation Act. Under the 2018 Provincialisation Act again several Madrasas were provincialised. Nevertheless, religious instructions and religious education continued to be imparted in these provincialised Madrasas, although they were now wholly maintained out of State funds.

5. A decision was then taken by the Government of Assam on 13.11.2020 in its meeting of Council of Ministers to convert the “provincialised” Madrasas into regular High Schools and to withdraw the teachings of theological subjects in such Madrasas. There was a similar decision taken in the same meeting to convert the “provincialised” Sanskrit Tolls into Study Centres. In Sanskrit Tolls, inter alia, religious instructions were being given, though these too were fully maintained out of State

                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                        1
                        2
                        3
                        4
                        5
                        6
                        7
                        8
                        9
                        10
                        11
                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                        supreme today icon
                        logo-black

                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                        Please visit our Training & Support
                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                        qr

                        Scan Me!

                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                        whatsapp-icon Back to top