SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 466

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MALASRI NANDI, J.
Magma Hdi General Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Smti Ira Thakuria W/O Prabin Thakuria And 5 Ors - Respondents
MAC App. 667 of 2019
Decided on : 22-06-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. R. Goswami
For the Respondents: Mr. D. Mondal

Point of Law : An addition of 25% where the deceased was between the age of 40-50 years and 10% where the deceased was between the age of 50-60 years should be regarded as the necessary method of computation.

Headnote:

Appeal - Compensation - Challenging award - Factum of accident has not been disputed in this case - Tribunal after appreciating evidence of witnesses and documents available in record, awarded compensation in favor of claimants - An addition of 25% where the deceased was between the age of 40-50 years and 10% where the deceased was between the age of 50-60 years should be regarded as the necessary method of computation. (Para 10).

Findings of the Court :

Deceased was a bachelor at the time of accident - As such, the standard of deduction towards personal and living expenses is applicable as stated in the case (Supra) - As deceased was a bachelor, 50% income is required to be deducted with the presumption that had deceased been alive, he could have spent 50% for his personal and living expenses - Deceased was 22 years of age at the time of the accident. So 40% should be added along with his established income of Rs. 13,000/- Hence, monthly income of the deceased is considered as Rs. 13,000/-+5,200(40%) =18,200/-.

Result : Appeal partly allowed.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel appearing for the appellant/Insurance Company as well as Mr. D. Mondal, learned counsel appearing for the claimants/respondents.

2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant/Insurance company challenging the award on quantum of compensation passed by the learned Member, MACT, Kamrup (M) dated 19.08.2019 in MAC Case No. 2035/2015.

3. The factum of accident has not been disputed in this case. Learned tribunal after appreciating the evidence of the witnesses and the documents available in the record, awarded compensation in favour of the claimants amounting to Rs. 30,54,000/-(Rupees Thirty Lakhs Fifty Four Thousand).

4. Being highly dissatisfied and aggrieved with the award on higher side, this appeal has been preferred.

5. It was urged by learned counsel for the appellant Mr. R. Goswami that learned Tribunal in the absence of any reliable document considered the income of the deceased as Rs. 20,000/-per month on a one month old shop in a village area. It is also the submission of learned counsel for the appellant that the claimant had submitted an income certificate (vide Exhibit-3) which was issued by Palashbari Circle Officer stating that the deceased had opened an industry and his income was Rs. 20,000/-. But the Circle Officer is not the Competent Authority to issue Income Certificate in respect of non-agricultural occupation like businesses, or shop or an industry. As such, the amount of compensation needs to be interfered.

6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the claimant/respondent Mr. D. Mondal has submitted that both the parties have come to a amicable settlement on the point of income of the deceased i.e. Rs. 13,000/-per month. Learned counsel for the appellant Mr. R. Goswami has contended that the Insurance Company has no objection to fix the income of the deceased as Rs. 13,000/-per month. Hence, Rs. 13,000/- be considered as monthly income of the deceased.

7. Admittedly, the deceased was 22 years of age at the relevant time of accident. As per the judgment of Sarla Verma Vs. DTC, reported in (2009) 6 SCC 121, the multiplier would be 18.

8. As per SLP(Civil) No. 25590 of 2014 (National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs-Pranay Shethi & Ors.) the Hon’ble Supreme Court has fixed compensation in case of death reasonable figures on conventional heads, namely-Loss of estate and Funeral expenses should be Rs. 15,000/-and Rs. 15,000/-respectively. As per the impugned judgment, the aforesaid amount shall be enhanced at the rate of 10% in every three years. Hence, amount of loss of estate and funeral expenses comes to Rs. 16,500/-on each count.

9. In the case in hand, the deceased was a bachelor at the time of accident. As such, the standard of deduction towards personal and living expenses is applicable as stated in the case of Sarla Verma (Supra). As the deceased was a bachelor, 50% income is required to be deducted with the presumption that had the deceased been alive, he could have spent 50% for his personal and living expenses.

10. In the case of National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi and Ors. reported in SLP (Civil) No. 25590/2014, it was observed that while determining the income of the deceased in case of self-employed or on a fixed salary, an addition of 40% of the established income should be the warrant where the deceased was below the age of 40 years. An addition of 25% where the deceased was between the age of 40-50 years and 10% where the deceased was between the age of 50-60 years should be regarded as the necessary method of computation.

11. In the instant case, as the deceased was 22 years of age at the time of the accident. So 40% should be added along with his established income of Rs. 13,000/-. Hence, monthly income of the deceased is considered as Rs. 13,000/-+5,200(40%)=18,200/-.

12. In view of the above discussion, the computation of compensation is awarded as follows:-

    (a) Annual income of the deceased=Rs. 18,200/-X12==2,18,400/-.

(b) After deducting 50% fro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top