DEVASHIS BARUAH
Assam Gramin Vikash Bank Represented By The Branch Head – Appellant
Versus
Prakash Borah S/o Late Purno Borah – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. P. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. KK Nandi, learned counsel for the caveator who is the respondent No.1.
2. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 10.07.2019, the order dated 02.11.2021 as well as the order dated 17.06.2022, passed in Title Suit No.465/2018.
3. Taking into consideration the question involved in the instant proceedings, the instant petition is taken up for disposal at the motion stage.
4. In view of the order which this Court proposes to pass the presence of the proforma defendant is not necessary.
5. The facts of the instant case is that the respondent No.1 herein as plaintiff has filed the suit being Title Suit No.465/2018 against the Proforma Respondent herein. The case of the plaintiff in the said suit is that the proforma defendant herein is the owner of a plot of land measuring 1 katha 10 lecha covered by Patta No.344 (old) 792 (new) Dag No.606/606 (old), 1950 (new) of village No.2, Japorigog Mouza Beltola, district Kamrup (M) Assam.
6. Upon the said land the Proforma Respondent herein started construction of a multistoried RCC building. The plaintiff being interested approached
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.