SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 726

Prem Raj Goala – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : U.K. Nair.
For the Respondents: SC.

JUDGMENT :

Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, J.

1. Heard Mr. U.K. Nair, learned senior counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Kaushik, learned counsel for the respondents no. 1, 2, 3 and 5 being the authorities under the Elementary Education Department, Government of Assam and Mr. A. Chaliha, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 being the authorities under the Finance Department, Government of Assam.

2. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed, we are of the view that the respondent no. 6 need not be heard for the present. Accordingly, we also ignore the office note of 19.05.2020 which shows that neither the A/D Card nor any un-served notice has been received in respect of the respondent no. 6.

3. The petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the Manipur MV School in the Hailakandi on 20.10.1993 and accordingly, he joined on 21.10.1993. By a subsequent order of 19.09.2002, the service of the petitioner was regularized against an existing non-plan vacancy in the school concerned. On 16.03.2016, the petitioner submitted a letter of resignation before the District Elementary Education Officer, Hailakandi stating that he intended to contest the Assam Assembl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top