SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 837

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
Abdul Haque Choudhury, S/o Late Mazammil Ali Choudhury – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : L.R. MAJUMDAR

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. LR Majumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S Baruah, learned Junior Government Advocate for the respondent No.1 being the Judicial Department, Government of Assam and Mr. HK Das, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3 respectively being the Registrar (Administration) Gauhati High Court, Guwahati and the Chief Judicial Magistrate Cachar, Mr. B Chakraborty, learned counsel for the respondent No.4 being the Accountant General (A & E), Assam.

2. The petitioner was appointed as a casual employee (contingent) on a fixed remuneration of Rs.900/-per month w.e.f. 01.11.1993 as per the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate (for short, the CJM) Cachar dated 30.10.1993. Subsequently, the services of the petitioner stood regularised as per the order dated 17.11.2015 of the CJM Cahcar and thereupon he retired from service on 31.10.2020.

3. The grievance raised in this writ petition is that the pensionery benefits of the petitioner had not been paid. In this respect, a communication dated 02.12.2020 of the Senior Accounts Officer in the Office of the Principal Accountant General (A & E), Assam has been brought to the notice of the Court which provid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top