IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Bijay Borah, S/o. Late Tulan Borah & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Assam, Rep. by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Assam, Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) Nos. 5470, 5994, 6544, 6815, 6181, 5956, 6933, 5641, 5206, 6107, 6070, 7357, 7066 of 2021, WP(C) Nos. 2418, 34, 4786, 2159, 3035, 3927, 2402, 2047, 693, 2302, 2503, 623, 462, 506, 2008, 3085, 1593, 3057, 695, 253, 521, 1949, 3558, 5310, 501, 1165, 1693, 3164, 1077, 2022, 3905, 365, 696, 836, 1950 of 2022
Decided On : 22-12-2022
National Food Security Act, 2013 - Section 2 (5), (23), (16), (4), 3, 9, 10, 12, 27, 36, 39, 40, 12 (2) (b), 22 (4) (d) - Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Fair price shops - Ration cards - Renewed licences - Whether action of State Government in tagging fair price shops having 50 or less than 50 ration cards to nearest fair price shops is within parameters of Constitutional - Whether action of respondent State is within realm of Constitutional mandate, it would be relevant to take note of Act of 2013 and Rules framed therein under as well as also Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Orders issued in pursuance thereof on basis of which petitioners claim right upon licences being issued to them – Held, Contention of petitioners that in terms with Rule 7 (6) (c) of Assistance Rules, 2015, petitioners are willing to purchase, install and maintain EPOS device and as such EPOS device cannot be reason for policy decision - Contention is misconceived in as much as Assistance Rules, 2015 confers a discretion upon State Government to adopt any of models in Rule 7 (6) of Assistance Rules, 2015 - State Government for economic and administrative reasons has approved System Integrator model, Court cannot interfere with such a decision and as such said contention is turned down - Amongst various writ petitioners, there are some writ petitioners who are specially abled or are widows - Taking into account that Government has already decided in its Cabinet meeting not to apply said decision to those persons who are specially abled or are widows, Court directs State respondents to renew their licences of those petitioners belonging to category of specially abled or widows, if not already done - It is also to be taken note of that in some cases, Licensing Authority had renewed licences of petitioners - Such renewal is contrary to policy decision of State Government and as such renewal so granted would not confer any right upon such writ petitioners - Such writ petitions would definitely be entitled to refund of renewal fees – Petitions dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. R.C. Borpatra Gohain, the learned senior counsel assisted by Mrs. S. Borpatra Gohain along with all other counsels appearing on behalf of all the petitioners in the writ petitions. I have also heard Mr. D. Saikia, the learned Advocate General, Assam assisted Mr. D. Nath, the learned Senior Government Advocate for the State respondents.
2. The issue involved in the batch of the writ petitions relates to as to whether the action of the State Government in tagging the fair price shops having 50 or less than 50 ration cards to the nearest fair price shops is within the parameters of the Constitutional mandate. The stand of the respondent State is based upon that such measures are being taken to progressively undertake necessary reforms in the Targeted Public Distribution System in consonance with the National Food Security Act, 2013 (for short, the Act of 2013) and its implementation thereof.
3. For ascertaining as to whether the action of the respondent State is within the realm of the Constitutional mandate, it would be relevant to take note of the Act of 2013 and the Rules framed therein under as well as also the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and the Orders issued in pursuance thereof on the basis of which the petitioners claim right upon the licences being issued to them.
4. Let this Court first take into consideration the Act of 2013. The Act of 2013 was enacted to provide for food and nutritional security in human life cycle approach, by ensuring access to adequate quantity of quality food at affordable prices to people to live a life with dignity and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. It is beneficial to refer to the “Introduction” to the Act of 2013 to understand the scope and purpose of the said Act which is reproduced herein below:-
Eradicating extreme poverty and hunger is one of the goals under the Millennium Development Goals of the United Nations. It casts responsibilities on all State parties to recognize the right of everyone to adequate food. Food security means availability of sufficient foodgrains to meet the domestic demand as well as access, at the individual level, to adequate quantities of food at affordable prices.
Providing adequate food has always been focus of the Government's planning and policy. However, this legislation marks a paradigm shift in addressing the problem of food security from the current welfare approach to a right based approach. This legislation would confer legal rights on eligible beneficiaries to receive entitled quantities of foodgrains at highly subsidized prices. Besides, it also confers legal rights on women and children and other special groups such as destitute, homeless, disaster and emergency affected persons and persons living in starvation to receive meal free of charge or at affordable price.”
5. Article 47 of the Constitution of India inter-alia provides that the State shall raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its people and the improvement of public health as among its primary duties. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, to which India is a signatory, also casts responsibilities on all State parties to recognize the right of everyone to adequate food. Eradicating extreme poverty and hunger is one of goals under the Millennium Development Goals of the United Nations. In the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs. Union of India and Others, reported in (2021) SCC Online SC 441, the Supreme Court observed that the right to life as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution gives right to every human being to live a life of dignity with access to at least bare necessities of life. It was observed that to provide food security to impoverish persons is the bounden duty of all States and the Governm
Union of India and Others vs. N.S. Rathnam
Navjyoti Cooperative Group Housing Society vs. Union of India and Others
Om Kumar and Others vs. Union of India
Sarkari Sastha Anaj Vikreta Sangh, Tahsil Bemetra and Others vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
Madhya Pradesh Ration Vikreta Sangh Society and Others vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Kerala State Beverages (M and M) Corporation Limited vs. P.P. Suresh and Others
Ugar Sugar Works Ltd. vs. Delhi Administration & Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the cancellation of Fair Price Shop vacancies in view of the implementation of the National Food Security Act, 2013 was necessary for the impl....
The court upheld the validity of amendments regulating the public distribution system, ruling no fundamental rights were violated by limiting fair price shop allotments to three per agency.
The establishment of fair price shops is a policy decision by the State, and existing shop holders have no legal rights to oppose new shops based on prior guidelines.
The court stressed the necessity of transparent and fair processes for licensing Fair Price Shops, affirming that government actions must comply with constitutional principles of equality.
The establishment of fair price shops is a policy decision of the State Government; guidelines are not legally binding rights. Existing license holders cannot claim exclusive operation rights in over....
The court emphasized that the appellants had no legal right to challenge the State's policy decision, as it was taken at the top level of the administrative hierarchy and implemented through the subs....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.