IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH AT KOHIMA BENCH
SONGKHUPCHUNG SERTO, DEVASHIS BARUAH, JJ.
Jai Kishan Sharma @ Jackson S/o Late Manohar Lal Sharma – Petitioner
Versus
National Investigation Agency and Another – Respondents
CRAPL No. 3 of 2020
Decided On : 27-04-2022
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 120B, 384, 34 – Code of Criminal Procedure1973 – Section 173(8) – Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 – Section 2(i)(1), 3,13, 17 , 20 –of Nagaland Security Regulation, 1962 – Section 7 – Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy other than a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable as aforesaid – Whoever commits extortion shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend – Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention – This is an appeal directed against Order passed by Special Judge, NIA, in NIA Case taking cognizance of offences charged against appellant and his co-accused in Charge-Sheet submitted by NIA in NIA Case – Held, In conclusion, we are of view that facts and circumstances given in Charge-sheet and materials collected and submitted so far has made out offence charged against accused persons, therefore, there is nothing illegal or irregular in order impugned in Appeal – As such we find no reason to interfere – Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
SONGKHUPCHUNG SERTO, J.
1. This is an appeal directed against the Order dated 14.02.2022 passed by the Special Judge, NIA, Dimapur, in NIA Case No. RC-10/2019/NIA/GUW, taking cognizance of the offences charged against the appellant and his co-accused in the Charge-Sheet submitted by the NIA in NIA Case No. 10/2019/NIA/GUW dated 17.09.2019.
2. Heard Mr. Biswajit Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the appellant assisted by Mr. Sanjay Shah and Mr. Moa Jamir. Also heard Mr. Vishal Dwivedi, learned Special PP, NIA and Ms. V. Suokhrie, learned PP for the State of Nagaland.
3. On 20.08.2019, the Special Operation Team of Dimapur Police was pressed on duty following an information received through sources and they intercepted a vehicle (Maruti Alto car) bearing Registration No. NL-07C-3984 at M.P. Road, Dimapur, and apprehended the occupants of the vehicle namely, Luckin Mashangva @ Wanking Lowang @ David (A-1) and Jaikishan Sharma @ Jackson (A-2), the appellant herein. On search the team recovered a sum of Rs. 18,910/- (Rupees Eighteen Thousand Nine Hundred and Ten) from the possession of Luckin Mashangva and a sum of Rs. 10,27,910/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Twenty Seven Thousand Nine Hundred and Ten) from the possession of Jaikishan Sharma (the appellant). After the apprehension of the two accused and seizure of the amounts mentioned above, the Special Operation Team took them to Dimapur East Police Station for interrogation. Based on their statements, another two persons namely, Samgin @Sangin @ Samging Wangsu and Shri Wanglik Tangjang @ Nalik, who were later made accused Nos. 3 and 4 respectively, were apprehended by the same Special Operation Team from Hotel Saramati, Dimapur. On their arrest a sum of Rs. 99,000/- (Rupees Ninety Nine Thousand) and a sum of Rs. 360/- (Rupees Three Hundred and Sixty) were recovered from the possession of the A-3 and A-4 respectively. During interrogation, it was revealed that the A-1, i.e. Luckin Mashangva is a self-styled Major of the NSCN(IM) and he and Jaikishan Sharma (A-2), the appellant herein, were always in touch with each other and they were involved in extortion of money from businessmen from Arunachal Pradesh by threatening and also destroying machineries of contractors when they did not relent to their demand. Further, it was also revealed that Jaikishan Sharma, the appellant, used to get Power of Attorneys in the name of some firms from many contractors in Arunachal by using his relationship with senior members of the NSCN(IM) including Luckin Mashangva, and from the profits he got out of such contract works, he used to send money to Luckin Mashangva or his wife through banking channels. Due to the facts and circumstances stated above and the revelations made, the FIR No. 0204/2019 was registered under Section 384 and 34 of the IPC read with Section 7 of Nagaland Security Regulation, 1962 (in short, NSR) against all the four accused. On 22.08.2019, the accused persons were produced before the learned CJM, Dimapur, and on that day the NIA submitted an application before the learned CJM, Dimapur, for permission to formally arrest the accused Luckin Mashangva and Jaikishan Sharma in connection with the NIA Case No. RC-03/2019/NIA/GUW, which was registered in Arunachal in connection with the murder of an MLA, and at the same time prayed for their production before the Special NIA Court at Yupia, Itanagar.
4. In the meanwhile, the Ministry of Home Affairs, CTCR Division, North Block, New Delhi vide Order F. No. 11.0.11/44/2019/NIA dated 13.09.2019 directed the NIA to take up investigation of the case. Following the Order, the NIA re-registered the earlier FIR case as FIR No. RC-10/2019/NIA/GUW on 17.09.2019 under Section 384 and 34 of the IPC, Section 7 of NSR and Section 13 and 20 of UA(P) Act against the four accused, thereby adding two sections of UA(P) Act. After registration of the FIR, the NIA took over the investigation of the case and during the investigation, it was confirmed tha
(1) Accused shall not be entitled to be released on bail only that there are reasonable grounds for believing that accusation against such person is prima facie.(2) Once UA(P) Act is invoked, Magistr....
The court established that involvement with a banned terrorist organization and the collection of levies for such groups constitutes serious offenses under the UA(P) Act, warranting denial of bail wh....
The court established that under the UAPA, particularly Section 43D(5), the standard for denying bail is based on whether the accusations are prima facie true, which requires a careful examination of....
Point of Law : Exercise to be undertaken by the court at the time of considering the bail plea of the accused is markedly different from discussing the merits or demerits of the evidence.
(1) Sanctioning Authority is required to apply its mind on the basis of fact gathered in course of investigation by Investigating Agency.(2) NIA can carry on further investigation and submit a supple....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.