MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA, MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Md. Amir Hasan @ Amir Hasem S/o Late Umed Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA, J.
1. Heard Ms. S.G. Baruah, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Ms. S. Jahan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State respondent no. 1 as well as Mr. B.M. Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 (informant).
2. This criminal appeal has been preferred under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the appellants, namely, (i) Md. Amir Hasan @ Amir Hasem, (ii) Md. Idrish Ali, (iii) Md. Ruhul Amin (iv) Md. Nazimuddin and (v) Mustt. Rohima Khatun impugning the Judgment and Order dated 03.12.2019 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, (F.T.C.), Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur in Sessions Case No. 05(NL)/2015, whereby, the present appellants were convicted under sections 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000/-, only each and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for another 6 (six) months each.
3. The facts relevant for adjudication of this appeal, in brief, are as follows:
V.K. Mishra And Another vs. State of Uttarakhand and Another
The court affirmed the conviction for murder and grievous hurt, emphasizing the reliability of eyewitness testimony and medical evidence in establishing guilt.
Point of law: Offence of Murder – Chain of circumstances proved – Common intention – Conviction justified.
The court established that eyewitness testimonies can be reliable even if related to the victims, especially when corroborated by medical evidence, addressing distinctions in criminal liability under....
The reliability and credibility of eyewitness testimony, the significance of absconding as incriminating evidence, and the application of legal provisions under Section 302 and Section 304 Part II of....
Prosecution must prove the case beyond reasonable doubt; inconsistent eyewitness testimony can undermine the prosecution's case, leading to acquittal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for trustworthy and consistent evidence, especially in cases involving oral dying declarations, and the significance of the FIR and....
The burden of proof rests on the prosecution to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and contradictions in eyewitness testimonies may result in acquittal.
The judgment emphasizes the requirement for reliable and corroborated evidence in criminal cases, and the admissibility of confession and recovery of material objects.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.