SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 415

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Manish Choudhury, Robin Phukan, JJ.
Sri Birsha Murah, S/o Late Pusku Murah - Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam - Respondent
Criminal Appeal (J) no. 56/2019
Decided On : 10-04-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A. Tiwari, Amicus Curiae
For the Respondent: Ms. N. Das, Additional Public Prosecutor

The court affirmed the conviction for murder and grievous hurt, emphasizing the reliability of eyewitness testimony and medical evidence in establishing guilt.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 374(2) and 383 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 325, and 324 - Conviction for murder and grievous hurt - Accused convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, along with additional sentences for grievous hurt - The prosecution established that the accused caused grievous injuries leading to death, supported by medical evidence and eyewitness accounts. (Paras 1, 46)

(B) Eyewitness Testimony - The court emphasized the reliability of eyewitnesses, particularly those who were injured, and clarified that their relationship to the deceased does not inherently discredit their testimony. (Paras 40, 41)

Facts of the case:
The accused-appellant was convicted for the murder of Bideshia Mirdha and for causing grievous hurt to two others during a dispute, resulting in death and serious injuries. (Paras 1, 2)

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the conviction based on credible eyewitness accounts and medical evidence, affirming the trial court's judgment. (Paras 46, 47)

Issues: The main issues included the credibility of eyewitnesses, the nature of injuries, and the accused's intent. (Paras 40, 44)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the evidence from injured eyewitnesses was credible and corroborated by medical findings, establishing the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 44, 46)

Result: Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.

 

The instant criminal appeal under Section 383 read with Section 374[2], Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [‘the CrPC’ or ‘the Code’, for short] from jail is directed against a Judgment and Order dated 07.03.2019 passed by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh in Sessions Case no. 112/2015 [The State of Assam vs. Sri Birsha Murah]. By the said Judgment and Order dated 07.03.2019, the accused-appellant has been convicted for the charge of murder under Section 302, Indian Penal Code [IPC] and he has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for another period of 1 [one] month. In addition, the accused-appellant has also been convicted for the offences under Section 325, IPC and Section 324, IPC. For the offence under Section 325, IPC, the accused-appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 [five] years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for another 1 [one] month. For the offence under Section 324, IPC, the accused-appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 1 [one] year.

2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, was that on 22.03.2012, a First Information Report [FIR] was lodged before the In-Charge, Ghoramara Police Out Post by the informant-P.W.2 alleging inter alia to the effect that at around 07-00/08-00 p.m. on 21.03.2012, the accused persons, namely, [i] the accused-appellant, Sri Birsha Murah; [ii] Smti. Rambha Murah, wife of Sri Birsha Murah; and [iii] Sri Debra Murah, son of Sri Birsha Murah; all residents of Rachi Line, Ramai Tea Garden; got engaged in a dispute with [i] the brother of the informant-P.W.2, Bideshia Mirdha; [ii] Sri Shyamlal Mirdha @ Putlu Mirdha; and [iii] Smti. Lakhi Mirdha, wife of Sri Shyamlal Mirdha; residents of the same Line and in the process, the accused persons caused grievous injuries on them with axe and hoe. As a result, Bideshia Mirdha died on the spot. As Sri Shyamlal Mridha and Smti. Lakhi Mirdha sustained grievous injuries on their persons, they were undergoing treatment in critical conditions in the Assam Medical College & Hospital [AMC&H], Dibrugarh.

3. On receipt of the said FIR, the In-Charge, Ghoramara Police Out Post registered the same vide General Diary Entry no. 334 dated 22.03.2012 and forwarded the FIR to the Officer In-Charge, Lahowal Police Station for registering the same under proper sections of law. At the same time, the In-Charge, Ghoramara Police Out Post, Sri Bhupen Kumar Sarma, Sub-Inspector of Police [P.W.14] took up the investigation of the case. On receipt of the FIR, the Office In-Charge, Lahowal Police Station registered the same as Lahowal Police Station Case no. 38/2012, on 22.03.2012, for the offences under Sections 302/326/34, Indian Penal Code [IPC] and entrusted the investigation to P.W.14.

4. The Investigating Officer [I.O.] of the case, P.W.14 during the course of investigation visited the place of occurrence on 22.03.2012 itself and held the inquest on the deadbody of the deceased, Bideshia Mirdha. After inquest, he prepared an Inquest Report [Ext.-1]. In order to ascertain the actual cause of death, the deadbody was sent to the AMC&H, Dibrugarh vide a Deadbody Challan [Ext.-4] for conducting post-mortem examination. The I.O. of the case also prepared a Sketch Map [Ext.-7]. The post-mortem examination on the dead body was conducted at the AMC&H on 22.03.2012 by Dr. Nayanmoni Pathak [P.W.11], Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine, AMC&H. Meanwhile, the injured persons viz. Sri Shyamlal Mirdha and Smti. Lakhi Mirdha had also undergone treatment at the AMC&H. The injured person, Sri Shyamlal Mirdha after initial treatment at the AMC&H, was referred to M/s Sanjivani Diagnostics & Hospital, Dibrugarh for better treatment. The I.O. of the case upon completion of investigation, submitted a charge sheet under Section 173[2], CrPC vi

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top