ROBIN PHUKAN
Don Pertin – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
1. Heard Mr. O. Duggong, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Ratan, learned CGC appearing for the respondent No. 1, Mr. D.K. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.2 to 5 and Mr. N. Pada, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 6.
2. This Writ Proceeding, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is being instituted by the petitioner, namely, Shri Don Pertin with the following prayers:
(ii) to quash and set aside the order dated 30.03.3019, passed by the head of Division Office, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, through e-mail Ref: 15453871642034.
(iii) to issue direction to the respondents to re-verify the land of the petitioner for RO dealership at Dambuk.
(iv) or in alternative, to issue direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 24.04.2019 and 20/05/2019 filed by him within a specified time period.
3. The background facts, leading to filing of the present writ petition is adumbrated herein-below:
Municipal Corporation of Ujjain vs. BVA India Ltd. (2018) 5 SCC 462
A.P. Dairy Development Corporation vs. B. Narasimha Reddy
Jagadish Mandal vs. State of Orissa
K.D. Sharma vs. Steel Authority of India
Municipal Corporation Neemuch vs. Mahadeo Real Estate
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.