SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 839

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR, KARDAK ETE, JJ.
Miya Hussain, S/o Late Abdul Kadir – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam – Respondent
Crl.A(J) 21 of 2022
Decided on : 05-08-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR. R J DAS
For the Respondent: MS. B BHUYAN(ADDL.PP ASSAM)

Point of Law: Conviction is on basis of circumstantial evidence, last seen theory and extra-judicial confession by accused persons.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302, 201, 34 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 313, 161 - Murder offence – Appeal against conviction - Appeal has been preferred assailing judgment and order passed by Court whereby appellant have been convicted for committing murder – Prosecution has failed to establish guilt of appellant. Para 64.

Finding of the Court: There is no evidence against appellant which point towards guilt of appellant except mentioning of his name in chargesheet – Court is of opinion that prosecution has failed to establish guilt of appellant - In fact it is a case of conviction based on no evidence - Conviction and sentence of appellant by judgment passed by the Sessions Judge cannot be maintained and accordingly is hereby set aside and quashed.

Result: Appeal allowed.

JUDGMENT :

Kardak Ete, J

Heard Mr. R. J. Das, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.

2. This appeal from Jail has been preferred by Miya Hussain assailing the judgment and order dated 13.05.2019 passed by the Court of Sessions Judge, Nagaon in Sessions case no. 387(N) of 2012 whereby the appellant namely Miya Hussain alongwith 5 (five) others yaccused namely: Md. Abdul Hekim, Md. Abdul Rahim, Md. Azizul Hoque @Aijul Hoque, Habibur Rahman and Sahed Ali have been convicted under Section 302/201/34 IPC, 1860 for committing the murder of Azibur Rahman and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and also to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/-each and in default, rigorous imprisonment for another six months. The accused persons have also been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and also to pay fine of Rs 1000/-each, in default, rigorous imprisonment for another one month under section 201/34 IPC, 1860.

3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 14.04.2008, the informant Mustt Rumena Khatoon lodged an FIR before the Dhing P.S alleging that there arose some dispute and the deceased, Azibur Rahman was in bad terms with the accused persons namely Md. Fakaruddin, Md. Abdul Hekim, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Abdul Rahim, Md. Habibur Rahman, Md. Azizul Hoque @Aijul Hoque, Miya Hussain and Sahed Ali with regard to certain issues for some time. After such dispute, the accused persons have been looking for an opportunity to cause harm to him. It is further alleged that on 13.04.2008, at around 7:00 pm, the above accused persons came to their house in group and called her husband namely, Azibur Rahman on the pretext of discussing certain important matters. Then when her husband took out his bicycle, she held a lamp to show him the road to outside and she saw the accused persons in the gleam of the lamp, but for the whole night her husband did not come back. As such, in the morning, she intimated the matter to other people and the people caught and interrogated Md. Habibur and Azizul Hoque who in turn admitted that they had killed her husband and buried him. Thereafter, the accused persons Md. Habibur and Azizul Hoque were handed over to the Police.

4. On receipt of FIR, the case was registered being Dhing P.S. Case no 61/2008 under section 302/201/34 IPC, 1860. After completion of the investigation, the Investigating Officer has filed a charge-sheet on 31.01.2010 against the accused persons namely Md. Fakaruddin, Md. Abdul Hekim, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Abdul Rahim, Md. Habibur Rahman, Md. Azizul Hoque, Miya Hussain and Sahed Ali while the accused persons Md. Fakaruddin and Sahed Ali were shown as absconder. The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagaon committed the case to the Court of Sessions, Nagaon on 16.10.2012.

5. The accused Sahed Ali subsequently appeared during the trial while the accused Md. Fakaruddin remained absconder. Based on the charge-sheet, charges were framed against the accused persons Md. Abdul Hekim, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Abdul Rahim, Md. Habibur Rahman, Md. Azizul Hoque, Miya Hussain and Sahed Ali and the same was read over and explained to the accused persons, to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The matter went up for trial. It is noted that during the proceedings of the trial, the accused Abdul Karim expired, as such, the case against him got abetted recorded vide order dated 08.07.2015.

6. During the course of trial, the prosecution has examined in all 9 (nine) witnesses. The statements of the accused persons under section 313 Cr.PC were also recorded. The defence plea is total denial, no evidence has been adduced by the accused persons. Upon consideration of the evidence adduced on records, the learned Trial Court concluded that considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the evidences and materials available on record, the accused persons in furtherance to common intention have caused

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top