SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 983

NELSON SAILO
Thanzuali – Appellant
Versus
State of Mizoram – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr Vanlalnghaka Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. Mary Lalruatkimi Khiangte

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. Vanlalnghaka, learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms. Mary L Khiangte, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. Samuel Vanlalhriata Chhangte, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5.

2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for setting aside and quashing the cancellation Order dated 05.02.2021 (Annexure-5) by which the House Pass that was issued to them have been cancelled by the respondent No. 4. The petitioners have also prayed for a direction to the respondents to conduct spot verification on their land and on the land of the respondent No. 5 to ascertain their respective land holdings.

3. Brief facts essential for disposal of the writ petition may be noticed at the outset. According to the petitioners, they were issued House Pass by the competent authority i.e., the respondent No. 4 under Section 26 & 36 of the Mizoram (Land Revenue) Act, 2013 (Act of 2013) read with Rule 14 & 15 of the Mizoram (Land Revenue) Rules, 2013 (Rules of 2013) with the approval of the Govt. of Mizoram dated 01.09.2017. The respective land of the petitioners are all located at Falkland, Aizawl, Mizoram. The petitioners contend that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top