IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
E.V.VENUGOPAL, J.
Chelimela Pramod Kumar and others – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others – Respondents
Writ Petition No.18173 of 2025
Decided On : 02-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks judicial intervention. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background on land allotment and cancellation. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments of petitioners regarding legal residence. (Para 7) |
| 4. court affirms rightful possession legally recognized. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. revenue records presumed accurate unless proven fraudulent. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. past judicial orders and administrative affirmations uphold rights. (Para 13 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. delay and procedural compliance concerns in property rights. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. supreme court emphasizes finality in settled rights. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 9. state cannot nullify valid allotments without evidence. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 10. impugned actions ruled arbitrary and lacking statutory ground. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 11. final order to restore petitioners' rights. (Para 26) |
ORDER :
E.V.VENUGOPAL, J.
The present writ petition is filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief :
“..to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the Proceedings No.El/D1/1117/2024, dated 26.05.2025 issued by the 3rd Respondent where under the Pattadar Pass Books-cum-title deeds were cancelled with a further direction to the 5th Respondent to resume the petitioners land in Survey No.936/2, an extent of Ac.2-00 gts., in Survey No.937/2 an extent of Ac.3-03 gts., and in Survey No.942 an extent of Ac.5-00 gts., situated at Jawaharnagar village, Kapra Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District, as being illegal, arbitrary and against the statutory provisions as contained in Sec.8 of the TELANGANA RIGHTS IN LAND AND PATTADAR PASS BOOKS ACT , 2020 as well as Sec.166-B of Telangana Land Revenue Act , 1317 Fasli and also in gross violation of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 08.06.1972 in W.P.No.3708 of 1970, orders dated 10.07.1984 in W.P.No.5097 of 1979, orders dated 10.07.1984 passed in W.P.No.19184 of 2009 and also in gross violation of the orders passed by the Commissioner of Land Revenue dt.12.07.1986 and also against the settled proposition of law laid down by the Constitutional Courts and consequently to set aside the Proceedings No.E1/D1/1117/2024, dated 26.05.2025 issued by the 3rd Respondent...”.
2. Heard Sri Sudhakar Rao Ambati, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mrs.R.Snehitha Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing learned Government Pleader for Assignment Sri DV Chalapathi Rao.
3. The petitioners seek judicial intervention against Proceedings No.E1/D1/1117/2024 dated 26.05.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent, whereby their pattadar passbooks-cum-title deeds pertaining to survey Nos.936/2 (Ac.2.00 gts.), 937 (Ac.3.03 gts.), 938 (Ac.3.10 gts.) and 942/2 (Ac.5.00 gts.) situated at Jawaharnagar village were cancelled.
4. The brief facts of the case of the petitioners are that Late C.Narsimha, an ex-serviceman, was allotted Ac.16.37 guntas of land in survey Nos.936, 937, 938 and 942 (hereinafter referred to as “subject land”) by the Jawaharnagar Co-operative Land Colonization Society for Ex-Servicemen through a resolution dated 09.11.1966. The land had been taken over from the Military Estate Officer on 23.07.1951 for rehabilitation of ex-army personnel and subsequently, pursuant to G.O.Ms.No.25 dated 23.10.1952, the same was allotted to the Labour Department for rehabilitation purposes. The area, initially known as the anti-tank range, was later renamed “Jawahar Nagar.”
(a) Assignments to ex-servicemen were governed by G.O.Ms.No.743 dated 30.04.1963, prescribing a non-alienation period of ten years, subsequently relaxed by G.O.Ms.No.1117 dated 11.11.1993, permitting sale after ten years without Government permission. The subject land was later included in the prohibited list under G.O.Ms.No.786 of 1999.
(b) Late C.Narsimha expired on 30.08.2002. Subsequently, his legal heirs viz.Krishna Swamy (father of respondent No.1) and respondents 3 and 4 herein have filed W.P.No.19184 of 2009, resulting in th
Ande Narasimha Rao Vs. State of A.P.
Vishwa Vijay Bharati Vs. Fakhrul Hassan
Union of India and others Vs. N.Murugesan and others
Union of India and another Vs. International Trading Company and another
The cancellation of pattadar passbooks for land requires substantial proof of fraud or illegality, and must adhere to principles of natural justice and binding judicial precedents.
The Joint Collector is competent to exercise power under BSO 15(18) and deal with the issues regarding assignment of land. The power under BSO 15(18) can be exercised at any time in view of the langu....
Revenue authorities may not adjudicate on civil title disputes under A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act; parties should approach civil court for resolution.
The main legal point established is that the power to cancel land allotment must be exercised within a reasonable time, and khatedari rights cannot be withdrawn after their conferment.
The court emphasized the necessity of exhausting statutory remedies before seeking judicial intervention in land disputes, affirming that the right of appeal must be explicitly provided by law.
Claims for land ownership after significant delays must be addressed by civil courts, as administrative bodies cannot adjudicate on disputed titles without violating established rights.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.