SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 2222

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
E.V.VENUGOPAL, J.
Chelimela Pramod Kumar and others – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others – Respondents
Writ Petition No.18173 of 2025
Decided On : 02-12-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sudhakara Rao Ambati
For the Respondent: GP For Assignment

The cancellation of pattadar passbooks for land requires substantial proof of fraud or illegality, and must adhere to principles of natural justice and binding judicial precedents.

Headnote:(A) Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2020 - Section 8 - Telangana Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli - Cancellation of pattadar passbooks - Proceedings were cancelled and declared illegal due to lack of evidence of fraud and violation of statutory rights, as supported by precedent judgments and principles of natural justice. (Paras 8, 24, 25).

(B) Administrative actions - Cancellation of land rights after prolonged possession requires explicit proof of wrongdoing, and actions must adhere to procedural fairness. (Paras 15, 18, 21).

Facts of the case:
Petitioners contested the cancellation of their land titles linked to ex-serviceman allotments, asserting long-standing lawful possession and judicial recognition. Proceedings No.E1/D1/1117/2024 were issued without personal hearing citing Section 8 of ROR Act 2020.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld petitioners' rights and declared the cancellation arbitrary and unlawful, reaffirming binding judicial orders and administrative codes.

Issues: Main queries involve the validity of the land title cancellation and adherence to procedural justice and statutory frameworks.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the impugned actions violated the principles of natural justice and lacked substantial evidence of fraud, emphasizing the importance of respecting long-held land rights under established legal precedents.

Result: Writ petition allowed; the cancellation of pattadar passbooks was set aside with directions to restore rights.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks judicial intervention. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. background on land allotment and cancellation. (Para 4 , 5)
3. arguments of petitioners regarding legal residence. (Para 7)
4. court affirms rightful possession legally recognized. (Para 8 , 9)
5. revenue records presumed accurate unless proven fraudulent. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
6. past judicial orders and administrative affirmations uphold rights. (Para 13 , 15 , 16)
7. delay and procedural compliance concerns in property rights. (Para 17 , 18)
8. supreme court emphasizes finality in settled rights. (Para 19 , 20)
9. state cannot nullify valid allotments without evidence. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
10. impugned actions ruled arbitrary and lacking statutory ground. (Para 24 , 25)
11. final order to restore petitioners' rights. (Para 26)

ORDER :

E.V.VENUGOPAL, J.

The present writ petition is filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief :

“..to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the Proceedings No.El/D1/1117/2024, dated 26.05.2025 issued by the 3rd Respondent where under the Pattadar Pass Books-cum-title deeds were cancelled with a further direction to the 5th Respondent to resume the petitioners land in Survey No.936/2, an extent of Ac.2-00 gts., in Survey No.937/2 an extent of Ac.3-03 gts., and in Survey No.942 an extent of Ac.5-00 gts., situated at Jawaharnagar village, Kapra Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District, as being illegal, arbitrary and against the statutory provisions as contained in Sec.8 of the TELANGANA RIGHTS IN LAND AND PATTADAR PASS BOOKS ACT , 2020 as well as Sec.166-B of Telangana Land Revenue Act , 1317 Fasli and also in gross violation of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 08.06.1972 in W.P.No.3708 of 1970, orders dated 10.07.1984 in W.P.No.5097 of 1979, orders dated 10.07.1984 passed in W.P.No.19184 of 2009 and also in gross violation of the orders passed by the Commissioner of Land Revenue dt.12.07.1986 and also against the settled proposition of law laid down by the Constitutional Courts and consequently to set aside the Proceedings No.E1/D1/1117/2024, dated 26.05.2025 issued by the 3rd Respondent...”.

2. Heard Sri Sudhakar Rao Ambati, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mrs.R.Snehitha Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing learned Government Pleader for Assignment Sri DV Chalapathi Rao.

3. The petitioners seek judicial intervention against Proceedings No.E1/D1/1117/2024 dated 26.05.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent, whereby their pattadar passbooks-cum-title deeds pertaining to survey Nos.936/2 (Ac.2.00 gts.), 937 (Ac.3.03 gts.), 938 (Ac.3.10 gts.) and 942/2 (Ac.5.00 gts.) situated at Jawaharnagar village were cancelled.

4. The brief facts of the case of the petitioners are that Late C.Narsimha, an ex-serviceman, was allotted Ac.16.37 guntas of land in survey Nos.936, 937, 938 and 942 (hereinafter referred to as “subject land”) by the Jawaharnagar Co-operative Land Colonization Society for Ex-Servicemen through a resolution dated 09.11.1966. The land had been taken over from the Military Estate Officer on 23.07.1951 for rehabilitation of ex-army personnel and subsequently, pursuant to G.O.Ms.No.25 dated 23.10.1952, the same was allotted to the Labour Department for rehabilitation purposes. The area, initially known as the anti-tank range, was later renamed “Jawahar Nagar.”

(a) Assignments to ex-servicemen were governed by G.O.Ms.No.743 dated 30.04.1963, prescribing a non-alienation period of ten years, subsequently relaxed by G.O.Ms.No.1117 dated 11.11.1993, permitting sale after ten years without Government permission. The subject land was later included in the prohibited list under G.O.Ms.No.786 of 1999.

(b) Late C.Narsimha expired on 30.08.2002. Subsequently, his legal heirs viz.Krishna Swamy (father of respondent No.1) and respondents 3 and 4 herein have filed W.P.No.19184 of 2009, resulting in th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top