MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
On the Death of Jatin Chandra Sharma his Legal Heirs – Appellant
Versus
Oil India Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA, J.
1. Mr. K.K. Mahanta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. K.M. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. M.K. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. K. Kalita, learned counsel for the Oil India Limited.
2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 14.06.2017, by which an amount of Rs. 23,97,895/- is sought to be recovered from the retirement dues of the husband of the petitioner No. 1.1, on the ground that the husband of the petitioner No. 1.1 had overstayed in service by 1 (one) year. The petitioners’ case is that the husband of the petitioner No. 1.1 joined as a Clerk/Typist in the establishment of the respondent no. 3 on 16.10.1990, on the basis of a judgment dated 13.08.1990, passed by this Court in Civil Rule No. 1083/1988.
3. The husband of the petitioner No. 1.1, in the Bio-Data Proforma made at the time of entry into service had recorded his date of birth to be 01.03.1956 and as such, should have retired on 28.02.2016. However, the husband of the petitioner No. 1.1 retired one year later on 28.02.2017.
4. The respondent No. 4 had issued a retirement letter dated 21.09.2016 to the husband of the petitioner
Chandi Prasad Uniyal and Others vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others
Kailash Singh vs. State of Bihar
Rantu Kumar Gohain vs. Assam Electronics Development Corporation and Others
Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Haryana and Others vs. Israil Khan and Others
Syed Abdul Qadir vs. State of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.