SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 1328

ROBIN PHUKAN
CHANDAN PATOWARY – Appellant
Versus
... – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: S.S. Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

Robin Phukan, J.

1. In this civil revision petition, the correctness or otherwise of the order dated 03.10.2019, passed by the learned Member, MACT, Barpeta in MAC Case No. 156/2019, is challenged by the petitioner, Sri Chandan Patowary S/o Late Pabitra Patowary of Chenga, Subha under the district of Barpeta.

2. It is to be mentioned herein that vide the impugned order, the learned Member, MACT, Barpeta has dismissed the claim petition filed by the petitioner under Section 166 and 140 of the MV Act, 1988 being not maintainable in law.

3. The factual background leading to filing the present petition is briefly stated as under.

4. The petitioner as claimant has filed a petition under Section 166 read with Section 140 of the MV Act before the Member, MACT, Barpeta claiming compensation on account of accidental injuries suffered by him on 17.12.2018, but the learned Member, MACT, Barpeta, vide the impugned order dated 03.10.2019, dismissed the petition on the ground that amended MV Act came into force w.e.f. 01.09.2019, which contained a provision that no application for compensation shall be entertained unless it is made within 6(Six) months from the date of accident, and the pr

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top