SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 1445

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN, J.
Atika Sultana — Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam — Respondent
AB 94 of 2022
Decided on : 01-02-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. A.K. Bhattacharyya, Advocate

The court emphasized the seriousness of corruption by public servants and the need for fair investigation in economic offences affecting public money and property.

Headnote:

Pre-arrest Bail - Corruption - IPC 120B/420/468/471, PC Act 2018 13(1)(a)/13(2)

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought pre-arrest bail in connection with a corruption case involving illegal appointment of Village Headmen. The investigation revealed irregularities and illegal gratification in the selection process, implicating the petitioner as the Chairman of the Selection Committee.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner, as the Chairman of the Selection Committee, was involved in anomalies and irregularities in the selection process, disregarding government notifications. The court also considered the gravity of the offence and the nature of corruption by public servants.

Issues: The issues involved the petitioner's involvement in the illegal appointment of Village Headmen, the gravity of the offence, and the privilege of pre-arrest bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the nature and gravity of the offence, the petitioner's role as a public servant, and the principles established in relevant Supreme Court decisions regarding bail in economic offences affecting public money and property.

Final Decision: The court rejected the privilege of pre-arrest bail, considering the nature and gravity of the offence.

JUDGMENT :

1. By way of this application under Section 438 CrPC, the petitioner, namely, Atika Sultana has sought for pre-arrest bail in connection with Vigilance PS Case No. 05/2021, under Sections 120B/420/468/471 IPC, read with Sections 13(1)(a)/13(2) of the PC Act (Amendment) Act, 2018.

2. Learned counsel for both the parties are present, who have already been heard.

3. I have also gone through the Case Diary.

4. Sodow Assam Gaon Burah Santha, West Zone lodged a complaint signed by 29 members, including the Secretary, before the Hon'ble Chief Minister, Assam, at Guwahati, on 30.09.2021, which was registered as CM Vigilance Case No. 05/2021, alleging inter alia, that the then Deputy Commissioner, South Salmara, Ms. Atika Sultana and ADC Saibar Rahman, along with other Government officials, committed gross irregularities in the appointment of posts of Village Headman (Gaonburah) and they had illegally appointed 70 numbers of Village Headman, taking bribe of Rs. 5 to 12 lacs, against each post.

5. During investigation, it was found that said Saibur Rahman, ADC, along with present petitioner, the DC and other officials, including Circle Officer, has indulged in unfair means in the process of selection, by way of illegal gratification from their favourite candidates.

6. At the conclusion of the investigation, charge sheet has been laid against Saibur Rahman, with submission that investigation so far as regards the present petitioner and others are going on and supplementary charge sheet will be laid under Section 173(8) CrPC.

7. The petitioner, herein, contended that after three years of selection, the present FIR has been lodged. It is submitted that selection of Gaonburah were done through a Committee, constituted under the Schemes/Rules and the Committee recommended the names of the selected candidates and duty of the petitioner as Deputy Commissioner, was only to ratify and to accept the recommendation of the Selection Committee and she was not a Member of the Selection Committee and not involved.

8. Further, it is contended that the petitioner has undergone seven numbers of ventral hernia surgery since 1990 to December 2021 and lastly, she also suffered from COVID-19 and has sought for the privilege of pre-arrest bail with an undertaking to co-operate with the investigation.

9. This Court carefully gone through the materials in the Case Diary as well as the report of the IO.

10. Certain discrepancies that have been surfaced during the investigation, is discussed below:-

    (1) In the selected list of candidates, certain persons were found to be selected but those persons were absent on the day of examination and those select list were duly signed by the present petitioner along with other Board Members. While confronted to the aforesaid, they admitted the same as a mistake.

(2) On the basis of the materials, the I/O has noted its finding that accused persons had selected their candidates in lieu of illegal gratification by depriving deserving candidates, which proves their criminal conspiracy and intent.

(3) Some of the candidates who applied for the posts of Village Headman against certain specific Lot areas (as per the guidelines, the applicant should be a domicile of the said village/lot), were allotted different lots by overwriting in the list of candidates whose applications were accepted. However, no initials for such corrections were found to be signed by the accused circle officer. Some were even allotted different villages under different lots which were not in conformity with the guidelines for the recruitment process.

(4) To accommodate their favourable candidates who gratified the accused persons, they selected the candidates belonging to the same villages (during field verification, the residences of 3 selected candidates were found adjacent to each other) which is not in conformity with the guidelines of recruitment to the post of Village Headman.

(5) The accused person kept spaces in certain columns empty to be filled up late

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    Judicial Analysis

    AI

    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top