SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 177

MALASRI NANDI
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
P. P. Enterprise – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :MR.S.U CHAKRABORTY Advocate
For the Respondent: MR.B MAHESHWARI

JUDGMENT :

None appears for the appellant. Heard Ms. M. Kalita, learned counsel for respondent.

2. This appeal has been preferred under Section 23 of the Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 against the judgment and order dated 17.04.2012 passed by the learned Railway Claims Tribunal at Guwahati Bench in Claim Application No. OA-I/GHY/2002/0179 (old No. O.A.179/02) allowing the claim of the respondent/applicant as compensation amounting to Rs.72,720/- only along with interest @ 6% per annum.

3. The case of the applicant/respondent is that the claimant booked the consignment of 172 katta cartoon in wagon No.72510 from GIMB to New Guwahati under invoice No.4, RR No.974186 dated 29.10.1999 in safe, sound and secured condition under Railway Risk Rate after meeting all legal and statutory inspections as per Railway Rules. At the time of unloading at destination New Guwahati, the applicant/respondent found that wagon seal and card lebels were absent and door was found in open condition. On unloading, in presence of CGS/ NGC and other Railway officers on duty, it was found that 119 katta cartoon in loose condition and total 4040 kg of sugar found short and all the facts were verified by the ra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top