IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Budi Habung, J.
The Assistant Manager HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd.- Petitioner
Versus
Surya Boruah S/o Mohan Ch. Boruah and Ors. – Respondents
MACApp./4/2020
Decided On : 12-03-2023
Motor Vehicle Act - Compensation Claim - Section 173 - 173 - 171 - The court discussed the negligent driving of the vehicle, possession of valid documents, claimant's age, avocation, and income at the time of the accident, and entitlement to compensation. The court also awarded interest at 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition.
Fact of the Case:
The claimant sustained grievous injuries and became permanently disabled due to a road accident. The court found the claimant entitled to compensation and held the insurer liable to pay.
Finding of the Court:
The court found in favor of the claimant, establishing the negligent driving of the vehicle and the claimant's entitlement to compensation.
Issues: The issues included the cause of the accident, possession of valid documents, claimant's age, avocation, and income, and entitlement to compensation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court decided in favor of the claimant based on evidence of negligent driving and the claimant's sustained injuries. The court also considered the claimant's age, avocation, and income for assessing compensation.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal, upheld the award of compensation, and ordered the insurer to pay the awarded amount along with interest.
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 is directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 22.10.2019 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mokochung, Nagaland in MAC Case No. 43 of 2017.
2. The facts of the case in brief are that on 28.04.2017, the respondent/claimant was travelling from North Lakhimpur to Guwahati in the vehicle bearing No. AS-07J/0666 (Chevrolet Beat car). At about 4.30 AM, near Golchoak Borghat Bye Pass, due to rash and negligent driving, the driver of the vehicle lost control and collided with two guard post of the road side and rolled down below the road. As a result, the claimant sustained grievous injuries all over his body for which he was admitted in the Civil Hospital for treatment. The vehicle also got badly damaged in the said accident. The claimant had undertaken treatment at different hospitals and also undergone many operations. However, despite of such treatments, the claimant could not be cured fully and became permanently disabled. Hence, the claimant filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mokokchung, Nagaland claiming a compensation of Rs. 34,90,400/- (Rupees Thirty-four lakhs ninety thousand four hundred).
3. The case was contested by the respondent/appellant by filing a written statement. After considering the pleadings the learned Tribunal framed 4 (four) issues:
(i) Whether the claimant sustained grievous injuries and became permanently disabled due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the offending vehicle No. AS-07J/0666 (Chevrolet Beat car)?
(ii) Whether at the material time of accident the offending vehicle was possessing all valid and effective documents including driving license?
(iii) What is the age, avocation and income of the claimant at the time of accident?
(iv) Whether the claimant is entitled to any compensation If yes, what amount and payable by whom?
4. During trial, the claimant examined himself as PW-1 and exhibited certain documents including Police report, Insurance policy of the vehicle, MVI report, driving license of the driver and proved that at the time the material time of accident the offending vehicle was under possession of all valid documents. He also produced medical documents including disable certificate, salary certificate to show his treatments for injuries and expenses incurred for his treatment. However, the Insurance Co. did not produce any witness.
5. After conclusion of the trial, the learned Tribunal on consideration of the material available on record and upon hearing the parties, came to the conclusion that the claimant is entitled to receive compensation and the insurer is liable to pay such compensation. The learned Tribunal while deciding the issue (i) held that the accident dated 28.04.2017 was the result of rash and negligent driving of the owner cum driver of the offending vehicle due to which the claimant sustained grievous injuries and became permanently disabled. The issue No. (ii) was also decided in affirmative in favour of the claimant. The issue No. (iii) was settled in favour of the claimant basing on the salary certificate of the claimant exhibited as P-8 for ?24,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Four Thousand only) per month. While deciding issue No.3, the learned Tribunal had considered Rs.14,000/-(Rupees Fourteen thousand only) as monthly income for assessment of the compensation and as the claimant at the time of accident was aged about 24 (twenty-four) years relevant multiplier was given as per the decision in the Sarla Verma’s case. And with regards to issue No. (iv), the learned Tribunal has decided in affirmative and the total amount payable have been calculated as Rs. 9,80,065/-(Rupees Nine lacs Eighty Thousand and Sixty Five) only. The learned Tribunal also decided that the claimant is entitled to the interest at 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim, i.e. from 17.12.2017 until payment against the awarded amount. And by the judgment and
AI
The main legal point established is the liability of the insurer to pay compensation for injuries sustained due to negligent driving, as well as the entitlement to interest under Section 171 of the M....
The liability of the owner and insurer in motor accident cases, even in the absence of driver negligence, and the maintainability of claim petitions for personal injuries under the M.V. Act.
The standard of proof in motor accident claims is based on the preponderance of probability, and the Tribunal's assessment of negligence and compensation was upheld due to lack of contradictory evide....
The liability of the owner and insurer in accidents involving motor vehicles, and the entitlement to compensation in the absence of fault or negligence on the part of the driver.
The principle that in motor accident claims, the burden of proof lies on the claimant to establish the case on the preponderance of probabilities, and the Tribunal is not strictly bound by the rules ....
The main legal point established is that in motor vehicle accident claims, the fault of the driver can be established based on witness testimony, and the award of future medical expenses and the inte....
Permanent disability does not automatically equate to loss of earning capacity; proper medical evidence is essential for substantiating claims.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the determination of liability for compensation in a motor vehicle accident, based on the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Act and the evidence p....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.