SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Md. Alauddin – Appellant
Versus
Bidyut Bhusan Das S/o Late Binod Behari Das – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The instant appeal has been preferred under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging a judgment and decree dated 17.07.2008 passed in Title Appeal No. 20/2006 by the learned District Judge, Karimganj as the First Appellate Court. Vide the impugned judgment, the judgment of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) dated 17.11.2003 passed in Title Suit No. 37/2001 by which the suit instituted by the present appellants was decreed, has been interfered with and reversed.
2. The appellants, who are 2 in numbers, were the plaintiffs in the suit registered as Title Suit No.37/2001 which was instituted for declaration of right, title and interest, confirmation of possession and permanent injunction. The defendant, apart from filing his written statement had also filed a counter claim in which he had prayed for a declaration of title and had also challenged two nos. of Sale Deeds. As mentioned above, the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), vide the judgment and decree dated 17.11.2003 had decreed the suit in favor of the appellant plaintiffs which was reversed by the First Appellate Court and it is this decision which is the subject matter of th
Krishna Lal Ghosh & Ors. Vs. Rabindra Kr. Ghose & Ors. 2016 (4) GauLT 700
Panchugopal Barua v. Umesh Chandra Goswami reported in (1997) 4 SCC 713
Prem Singh and Ors. Vs. Birbal and Ors. (2006) 5 SCC 353
R.V.E. Venkatachala Gounder Vs. Arulmigu Viswesaraswami & V.P. Temple and Anr. (2003) 8 SCC 752
Shyamal Kumar Roy Vs. Sushil Kumar Agarwal (2006) 11 SCC 331
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.