SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Kevineisienuo – Appellant
Versus
State of Nagaland – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND, J.
1. Heard learned counsel Mr. Moa Jamir and Mr. M. Solo for the petitioner. Also heard learned Sr. Government Advocate Ms. S. Mere for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 and learned counsel Mr. Akhrieu Chusi for the respondent No. 5.
2. The State Respondents are:
(ii) The Principal Director to the Government, Health & Family Welfare, Nagaland, Kohima.
(iii) The Director, Health & Family Welfare, Nagaland, Kohima.
(iv) The Chief Medical Officer, Kohima, Nagaland.
(v) Smt. Dzuzievonuo, Office Peon, Under the Establishment of Chief Medical Officer, Kohima, Nagaland arrayed as respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively.
3. The petitioner Smt. Kevineisienuo has filed this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari or mandamus or any other writ of like nature against the Office Order No. DHFW-3/117/Kma/Part-II/2018/ 6871-75 dated 04.09.2019 passed by the respondent No. 2 in appointing the respondent No. 5. The petitioner has also prayed for an app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.