DEVASHIS BARUAH
Jahangir Alom Sikdar S/o Late Abdus Sattar Sikdar – Appellant
Versus
Shahjahan Sikdar S/o Late Abdus Sattar Sikdar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 27.03.2024 passed by the Court of the Additional District Judge, Goalpara in Misc. Appeal No.06/2023 whereby the learned First Appellate Court had set aside the order of temporary injunction dated 21.08.2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Goalpara in Misc.(J) Case No.29/2023 arising out of Title Suit No.34/2023.
2. For the purpose of deciding as to whether the learned First Appellate Court was within it jurisdiction to interfere with the order passed by the learned Trial Court, this Court would like to take note of the brief facts which led to the filing of the instant proceedings.
3. The petitioner herein as plaintiff had instituted a suit claiming inter-alia that a plot of land measuring 2 kathas 8 lechas originally belonged to the father of both the plaintiff as well as the defendant No.1. Upon the death of their father, it was mutually agreed that the brothers, i.e. the plaintiff and the defendant No.1 would claim right in respect to 1 katha 1 lecha of land each and the remaining land which is around 6 lechas would be a suit path. This suit path has been specif
The need for a prima facie case, clarity in the description of the suit land, and consideration of balance of convenience and irreparable loss, harm, and injury are crucial in granting injunctions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and settled possession in granting or vacating interim injunctions under Order 39 Rule ....
Ownership rights and the enforceability of injunctions concerning land use were affirmed, even against prior arrangements.
The court upheld that an injunction may be granted based on prima facie evidence and balance of convenience even if construction is ongoing.
Principle of equity, which is cardinal while deciding the grant of equitable relief of injunction, has duly been considered.
Co-owner is not entitled to an injunction restraining another co-owner from exceeding his rights in common property absolutely and simply because he is a co-owner unless any act of person in possessi....
A temporary injunction requires a prima facie case, irreparable loss, and balance of convenience; mere establishment of a prima facie case is insufficient.
Court must be satisfied that party praying for relief has a prima-facie case and balance of convenience is in its favour- Besides above, while granting injunction, if any, Court is also required to c....
To obtain interim injunction, a petitioner must demonstrate a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and potential for irreparable harm; failure to satisfy these elements results in dismissal of t....
A temporary injunction cannot be granted without discussing essential principles, and a property owner cannot be restrained from using their property without a strong prima facie case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.