IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA, J.
Abul Kalam Azad, S/o. Late Abdul Jabbar - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, Assam and Ors. - Respondents
Crl. Pet No. 1 Of 2024
Decided On : 16-05-2024
Zimma - Rice Seizure - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482, Article 227 - 28.07.2023, 23.08.2023
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, Abul Kalam Azad, was found in possession of 460 bags of rice without proper documentation. The lower courts rejected his plea for zimma (custody) of the seized rice, directing it to be sold through auction.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's inability to produce purchase documents did not justify the rejection of his zimma plea, especially considering the perishable nature of the rice. It also noted the lack of evidence showing the rice was stolen.
Issues: The key issues were the ownership of the seized rice, the rejection of the zimma plea, and the potential decay of the perishable item.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that to prevent the rice from perishing and to secure the ends of justice, the seized rice should be given into the custody of the petitioner, who appeared to be the best person for its custody.
Final Decision: The court directed the Investigating Officer to give the zimma of the seized rice to the petitioner upon furnishing an indemnity bond of Rs.10 Lakhs.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. S. Hoque, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner, namely, Abul Kalam Azad impugning the order dated 09.11.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kamrup, Amingaon in Criminal Revision No. 39/2023 whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kamrup, Amingaon has upheld the orders dated 28.07.2023 and 23.08.2023 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup, Amingaon in connection with Chhaygaon P.S. Case No. 235/2023 whereby the prayer of the present petitioner seeking zimma of the 460 bags of rice (each bag containing 49 kgs. rice approximately) which were seized in connection with Chhaygaon P.S. Case No. 235/2023 was rejected.
3. The facts relevant for consideration of the instant criminal petition, in brief, are as follows:-
ii. It is also stated in the FIR that the owner of the godown Abul Kalam Azad was present at the time of conducting the search, however, he failed to produce any document relating to purchase and storage of such huge quantity of rice. It is also stated in the FIR that the seized rice was brought to the police station and the petitioner was also brought to the police station for interrogation. On receipt of said FIR, Chhaygaon P.S. Case No. 235/2023 was registered.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner Abul Kalam Azad was arrested in connection with Chhaygaon P.S. Case No. 235/2023 on 15.05.2023, however, as the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup granted him bail and he was released on 16.06.2023. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a businessman carrying out the business of rice in the name and style of “Saraighat Enterprise” and he used to purchase rice from Jorshimuli market at a cheaper rate and stored it in his go down situated in the said market. The petitioner has annexed as Annexure- I, a certificate issued by the President and Secretary of Jorshimuli Anchalik Market Management Committee to the effect that the petitioner is running the business of rice at Jorshimuli weekly Saturday market.
5. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner used to purchase the “Atap” rice from the open market and used to store the same in his godown. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after getting released on bail, the petitioner had filed a zimma petition before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup seeking zimma of the seized rice, however, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate by his order dated 23.08.2023 rejected the prayer for zimma on the ground that by an earlier order dated 28.07.2023, he had already directed the Investigating Officer to sell the entire quantity of seized rice through auction.
6. Being aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner had filed the criminal revision petition before the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kamrup, Amingaon. The said criminal revision petition has been registered as Criminal Revision No. 39/2023. By
AI
The central legal point established is that the perishable nature of seized items and the lack of evidence of theft should be considered when deciding on custody of seized goods.
Criminal Law - Unauthorized possession of 12 bags of PDS rice, each bag containing 50 kg and beer bottles from house of petitioner - Section 7 of E.C. Act, 1955 it is clear that said section provides....
Mandatory registration of FIR is required for cognizable offences, and unlawful seizure of goods without proper procedure contravenes established legal principles.
Mandatory registration of FIR is required for cognizable offences, and failure to adhere to this process invalidates subsequent legal actions.
Procedural lapses in FIR registration render subsequent search and seizure invalid, emphasizing the importance of following legal protocol in criminal actions.
Acquittal from criminal charges under the Essential Commodities Act entitles the plaintiff to claim compensation for financial losses due to unlawful seizure and state must honor legitimate claims wi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.