Back
MANISH CHOUDHURY, ROBIN PHUKAN
Bishnu Urangia – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual account of the murder incident. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details of post-mortem findings. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. process of investigation and charge framing. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. arguments presented by parties regarding evidence. (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. consideration of evidence and testimonies. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. examination of confession admissibility and circumstantial evidence. (Para 20 , 25 , 28 , 30) |
| 7. admissibility of confessions obtained by police custody was central to legal conclusions. (Para 26) |
| 8. discussion on non-examination of key witnesses. (Para 34 , 35 , 39) |
| 9. principles governing circumstantial evidence in criminal cases. (Para 41 , 42) |
| 10. conclusion and acquittal based on insufficient evidence. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
JUDGMENT :
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
1. The present criminal appeal from Jail under Section 383 , Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is preferred by the accused-appellant to assail a Judgment and Order dated 06.12.2019 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh in Sessions Case no. 14/2016. During the trial, the accused-appellant was charged for the offence of uxoricide and after the trial, he has been found guilty for the offe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
