SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 867

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Pinak Sankar Basu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam – Respondent
Criminal Appeal(Jail) No. 84 of 2020
Decided on : 19-07-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A. Kalita, Amicus Curiae
For the Respondent: Ms. A. Begum, Additional Public

The prosecution's failure to produce primary evidence of seized contraband under the NDPS Act vitiated the trial, leading to the reversal of the conviction.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 383 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20[b][ii][C] - Conviction for possession of Cannabis - Accused-appellant convicted and sentenced to 12 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1,50,000/- - Prosecution failed to produce primary evidence of seized contraband, leading to vitiation of trial - Non-compliance with Section 52A of NDPS Act noted. (Paras 1, 41, 42)

(B) Evidence - Primary evidence - Prosecution must produce seized contraband or certified inventory as primary evidence - Non-production leads to adverse presumption against prosecution. (Paras 41, 42)

Facts of the case:
The accused-appellant was convicted for possessing 77.36 kg of Cannabis, seized from a vehicle during a police check. The trial court's conviction was based on the evidence of police witnesses and seizure witnesses, but the physical evidence of the seized contraband was not produced in court.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to lead primary evidence regarding the seized contraband, leading to the conclusion that the trial was vitiated.

Issues: The main issues were whether the prosecution complied with the mandatory procedures under the NDPS Act, particularly Section 52A, and whether the absence of primary evidence affected the conviction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the prosecution's failure to produce the seized contraband or certified inventory constituted a significant procedural irregularity, warranting the setting aside of the conviction.

Result: The criminal appeal is allowed, and the conviction is set aside.

JUDGMENT :

M. Choudhury, J.

The instant criminal appeal from Jail under Section 383, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [‘the CrPC’ or ‘the Code’, for short] is preferred to assail a Judgment and Order dated 16.12.2019 passed by the Court of learned Special Judge, Nalbari in NDPS Case no. 11 of 2018, which arose out of Tihu Police Station Case no. 78/2018. By the Judgment and Order dated 16.12.2019, both the two charge-sheeted accused persons including the accused-appellant – Pinak Sankar Basu, have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 20[b][ii][C] of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances [NDPS] Act, 1985. On being found guilty, both the accused persons including the accused-appellant, have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 12 [twelve] years each and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,50,000/-each, in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of 1 ½ [one and half] years each.

2. The investigation was set into motion on institution of a First Information Report [FIR] before the Officer In-Charge, Tihu Police Station by an Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police [ASI], Bichitra Kalita [P.W.2] as an informant on 21.05.2018. The FIR was shown to be instituted in reference to Tihu Police Station General Diary Entry no. 382 dated 21.05.2018.

3. In so far as the contents of the FIR [Ext.-3] lodged in reference to Tihu Police Station General Diary Entry no. 382 are concerned, it inter alia stated that an information was received at Tihu Police Station on that day to the effect that a car was coming from Guwahati side by National Highway no. 31 towards Barpeta and the car was illegally carrying some amount of Cannabis [Ganja]. On the basis of the information and under supervision of the Officer In-Charge, Tihu Police Station, a search was conducted by the Police personnel from Tihu Police Station in a silver coloured Hyundai Accent car bearing registration no. WB-06/1392 at a place in front of Nathkuchi Police Post situated on National Highway no. 31 leading to Barpeta from Guwahati. On being searched, seventeen packets of different weights, wrapped in plastic, containing suspected contraband, Cannabis [Ganja] were found. The persons sitting in the driver seat and in the front seat of the vehicle bearing registration no. WB-06/1392 [‘the vehicle’, for short] were identified as [i] Sankar Yadav, son of Jagdish Ray, Khajur Bagan, Agartala, Tripura; and [ii] Pinak Chandra Basu, son of Pranab Basu, Gandhigram, Agartala, Tripura [‘the accused-appellant’] respectively. On their interrogation, it was learnt that they were accompanied by the owner of the vehicle [name unknown], a resident of Bidyanagar, Tripura. It was divulged that the suspected contraband, Cannabis [Ganja] were being carried in the vehicle from Agartala to West Bengal. It was further mentioned in the FIR that the owner of the vehicle was also travelling with the two accused persons, but seeing the Police personnel in patrolling duty conducting checks, he fled away. The FIR further mentioned that the suspected contraband, Cannabis [Ganja] in the form of seventeen nos. of packets of various sizes were seized and counted in presence of the senior most official. It was further mentioned that the vehicle was also seized. On being weighed, the packets containing suspected contraband, Cannabis [Ganja] were found to be 77.36 kgs. The accused persons were arrested at the place of occurrence and they were kept in Jail hajot.

4. On receipt of the FIR [Ext.-3], the Officer In-Charge, Tihu Police Station registered the same as Tihu Police Station Case no. 78/2018, on 21.05.2018, for the offences under Section 20[b][ii][C] and Section 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. There was a separate entry in the FIR [Ext.-3] to the effect that the FIR was received from one Girish Chandra Das, CB no. 368 of Tihu Police Station at 04-45 p.m. on 22.05.2018. After registration of the FIR, the Officer In-Charge, Tihu Police Station, Nabajit Talukdar [P

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top