SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 954

MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Shyamal Barman – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : B. Sarma.
For the Respondents: K.K. Parasar, L. Devi.

JUDGMENT :

MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA, J.

1. Heard Ms. B. Sarma, learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam as well as Ms. L. Devi, learned Legal Aid Counsel, representing the informant/respondent No. 2.

2. This Jail Appeal was registered on receipt of an appeal petition from the appellant, namely, Shyamal Barman, through the Superintendent District Jail, Barpeta, impugning the judgment dated 08.08.2019 passed by learned Special Judge, Barpeta in Special POCSO Case No. 81/2018, whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years with a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further simple imprisonment for 3 months.

3. The facts relevant for consideration of the instant Jail Appeal, in brief, are as follows:

    i. On 30.06.2018, the mother of the victim girl lodged an FIR before the Officer-in-Charge of Barpeta Road Police Station, inter-alia, alleging that on that day, at about 11.30 am, during the absence of her husband, when the informant was attending the cloth store of her husband and the mi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top