SANDEEP MEHTA, SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Tarini Deka – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.P. Khaund, J.
1. Heard Mr. M. Bhagabati, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. D. Saikia, learned Advocate General, Assam, Mr. R. Barpujari, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue, Mr. R.K. Bora, learned Addl. Sr. Government Advocate, Mr. J. Roy, learned Senior Counsel, NRL assisted by learned counsel Mr. D. Das and Ms. R. Borah, learned counsel for respondent No. 4.
2. These intra court appeals are preferred by the appellants with prayer to set aside and quash the common judgment and order dated 22.05.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) 3989/2022 and WP(C) 3528/2022 and to direct the respondent authorities to stay the entire process of requisition and acquisition of land initiated for setting up of the Marketing Terminal of Numaligarh Refinery Limited.
3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants are residents of different villages situated under the Hajo Revenue Circle in the district of Kamrup. The Government of Assam, vide several notices and orders dated 27.12.2021, 05.01.2022 and 13.01.2022, 23.03.2022 etc. issued by the Collector and the Deputy Commissioner, Kamrup, Amingaon had initiated a process for requisition of 427 bighas of land und
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.