IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUWAHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
Robin Phukan, J.
Sajida Jesmine D/o Faizul Haque – Petitioner
Versus
Abdul Hashim S/o Mozir Uddin and ors. – Respondents
Transfer Petition (C) No. 46/2024
Decided On : 16-08-2024
Transfer - Family Law - CPC Section 24 - The Court interpreted Section 24 of the CPC, emphasizing the balance of convenience and the right of the plaintiff to choose the forum, ultimately deciding to transfer the case to ensure a fair trial.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to transfer a family case from Guwahati to Karimganj, citing jurisdiction issues and the need for convenience due to her financial situation and the location of witnesses.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the balance of convenience favored the petitioner, as all significant events and witnesses were located in Karimganj, and the respondent's claims of residence in Guwahati were unsubstantiated.
Issues: Whether the Family Court in Guwahati had jurisdiction to hear the case and whether the case should be transferred to Karimganj for convenience and fairness.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the balance of convenience and the right of the plaintiff to choose her forum were paramount, leading to the conclusion that the case should be transferred to Karimganj.
Result: The petition to transfer the case was allowed, moving it from Guwahati to Karimganj.
JUDGMENT :
Robin Phukan, J.
Heard Mr. N. Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K. Deka, learned counsel for the sole respondent.
2. This petition, under Section 24 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (C.P.C.), 1908, is preferred by Smti. Sajida Jesmin for transferring F.C. (Civil) Case No. 301/2024, pending before the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court Kamrup (M) Guwahati to the court of learned District Judge, Karimganj.
The background facts:-
3. The background facts leading to filing of the present petition are briefly stated as under:-
Thereafter, on 12.07.2022, the respondent/opposite party returned to Dubai and thereafter, on 23.07.2022, family members of the respondent/opposite party assaulted the petitioner, demanding Rs. 10,00,000/- as dowry and driven her away from the matrimonial home with the minor child. Then, the petitioner was taking shelter in her parental home and since then, she has been living with her parents and she was treated at Karimganj Civil Hospital on 24.07.2022 and doctor prescribed her medicine for her physical injury and also advised her to do C.T. Brain(P).
On many occasions the petitioner was harassed both physically and mentally by the respondent and his family members, more particularly on 25.05.2022 and on 23.07.2022. After the incident of 23.07.2022, the petitioner lodged an ejahar before the Officer In-Charge, Nilambazar P.S. and also filed a complaint case, being C.R. No. 553/2024, before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karimganj, under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.).
In the meantime, the respondent also filed a petition under Section 281 of the Mahammadan Law, praying for restitution of conjugal life, before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court Kamrup (M) Guwahati, which was registered as F.C.(Civil) Case No. 301/2024 and the petitioner received notice to appear before the said court on 18.05.2024.
It the said case, the respondent stated that he is the original resident of Alomkhani village, under Nilambazar P.S. of Karimganj district and he served in various corporate sectors of Guwahati and thereafter, he had shifted to UAE, Dubai, wherein he is presently working. It is further stated that the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent was solemnized at Karimganj and they have started their conjugal life at Karimganj and the child was also born at Karimganj and she was driven out from the matrimonial home at Karimganj and all the cause of action of the case were arose at Karimganj.
In view of aforementioned facts and circumstances, the learned Principal Judge, Family Court Kamrup (M), Guwahati, has no jurisdiction to try the said case.”
Therefore, it is contended to transfer the F
Baburam Agarwalla vs. Jamunadas Ramji And Co. AIR 1951 Cal 239
Mrs. Maneka Sanjay Gandhi and Anr. vs. Ms. Rani Jethmalani (1979) 4 SCC 167
The Court established that the balance of convenience is a critical factor in transferring cases under Section 24 of the CPC, prioritizing the plaintiff's right to choose a suitable forum.
Point of Law : Transfer of matrimonial cases - inconveniences of the wife if the proceedings were to be transferred to Bengaluru outweighs the husband''s inconveniences in permitting the proceedings ....
The resolution of jurisdictional issues in divorce proceedings is best determined by the trial court based on factual disputes; mere inconvenience does not warrant a transfer.
High Courts have the authority under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code to transfer proceedings to subordinate courts, prioritizing parties' convenience and children's interests.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.