MANASH RANJAN PATHAK, MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Sabura Khatun, W/O- Lt. Rahijuddin Sk. – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam, Rep. By The Comm. And Secy. To The Govt. Of Assam, Home Deptt. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Mridul Kumar Kalita, J.
1. Heard Mr. S. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate, Assam appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 7.
2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, namely, Sabura Khatun, seeking adequate compensation on account of death of her husband, namely, Rohijuddin Sk., who died in the Gauhati Medical College and Hospital (GMCH), while in judicial custody, on 30.06.2018.
3. The facts for consideration of the instant writ petition, in brief, are that the husband of the petitioner, namely, Late Rohijuddin Sk. was arrested on 24.05.2018 in connection with Bilasipara Police Station Case No. 525/2018 under Sections 147/149/436/325 of the Indian Penal Code. The aforesaid case was registered on filing of an FIR, on 23.05.2018, by one Nur Hussain Bhuyann before the Officer-in-Charge of Bilasipara Police Station. In the said FIR allegations were made against the accused persons named in the FIR, including the deceased husband of the present petitioner, that they have set the house of the first informant on fire with an intention to forcefully disp
Nilabati Behera Vs. State of Orrisa and Ors. (1993) 2 SCC 746
The right to life under Article 21 includes the right to adequate medical treatment for prisoners, and failure to provide such treatment can lead to state liability for compensation.
State authorities are vicariously liable for negligence leading to custodial death, with victims entitled to compensation under Article 21 of the Constitution.
The state is strictly liable for unnatural deaths in custody, necessitating compensation for the victim's family under Article 21 of the Constitution.
State is liable for failing to protect individuals in police custody, requiring compensation for unnatural deaths under Article 21.
Compensation for custodial death necessitates proof of unnatural death; not every death in custody qualifies under the compensation scheme.
The court underscored the state's liability for custodial deaths and established a precedent for compensating victims against police violence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.