IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Kaushik Goswami, J.
Bahar Ahmed Laskar, S/O- Late Zain Uddin Laskar – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam Represented By The Principal Secretary To The Govt. Of Assam, Home And Political Department And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C)/6185/2023, WP(C)/6229/2023, WP(C)/6228/2023
Decided On : 19-09-2024
Disciplinary Action - Dismissal from Service - Assam Police Manual, Assam Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964, Assam Police Act, 2007 - The court upheld the dismissal of petitioners for gross misconduct, emphasizing the proportionality of punishment in administrative law.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, appointed as Head Constables in the Assam Police, were dismissed for allowing five container trucks carrying illegal Burmese areca nuts to enter Assam without proper checks during their duty at Jirighat Police Station.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the disciplinary authority's decision to dismiss the petitioners was justified, as their actions constituted gross misconduct and dereliction of duty, and the punishment was proportionate to the gravity of the charges.
Issues: Whether the penalty of dismissal from service imposed by the disciplinary authority was proportionate to the gravity of the charges against the petitioners.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the doctrine of proportionality, concluding that the punishment was not grossly disproportionate to the misconduct, and upheld the disciplinary authority's decision.
Result: The writ petitions are dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Kaushik Goswami, J.
1. Heard Mr. M. K. Borah, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners in WP(C) Nos.6228/2023 and 6229/2023 and Mr. A.H.M.R. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner in WP(C) No.6185/2023. Also heard Mr. J. K. Goswami, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam appearing for the State respondents.
2. By way of these writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging the orders dated 07.07.2023 and 27.09.2023 whereby the petitioners were dismissed from service. The facts of the case is that pursuant to a valid recruitment process the petitioners were appointed in the Armed Branch of the Assam Police and thereafter, the petitioners were working as Head Constable under the respondents. It is the specific case of the petitioners that while they were posted as Head Constable in Jirighat Police Station in the district of Cachar, Assam and were allotted the “Naka Duty” on 21.04.2023 at Jirighat Naka Post, the petitioners had taken a little break from their duties, when the incident happened for which an enquiry was constituted and after conclusion of the same they were dismissed from service. Accordingly, the present writ petitions have been filed.
3. Mr. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the punishment imposed i.e. “dismissal from service” by the disciplinary authority is not proportionate to the gravity of the offence proved and as such contends that the punishment be altered and reduced.
4. Per contra, Mr. J. K. Goswami, learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate, Assam submits that the gravity of the offence does not warrant any alteration of the quantum of the penalty imposed by the disciplinary authority by this Court while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. He further submits that the penalty was awarded in terms of Rule 66 Part-III of the Assam Police Manual read with Rule 7 of the Assam Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964 and as such warrant no interference from this Court.
5. I have given prudent consideration to the arguments made by both the parties and have perused the materials available on record.
6. Since Mr. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioners has argued only as regards quantum of the penalty imposed by the disciplinary authority, the only issue that falls for determination in these writ petitions is as to whether the penalty imposed by the disciplinary authority is proportionate to the gravity of the charges leveled. It appears that the petitioners while posted at Jirighat Police Station on the night of 21/22.04.2023 at Naka Checking duty at N.H. Way 37 Assam-Manipur, 5 nos. of container trucks were allowed to enter into the State from the neighbouring State without proper checking and making necessary entries in the Naka Checking Register and later on these 5 nos. of container trucks being intercepted at Gumrah PIC and upon checking Burmese areca nuts were seized from the said container trucks. Accordingly, show cause notices were issued to the petitioners on 08.05.2023 giving an opportunity to the petitioners to submit their written statement in defence. The statement of allegations contained in the show-cause notice is reproduced hereunder for ready reference :-
The doctrine of proportionality in administrative law allows judicial review of disciplinary actions, ensuring that penalties are not grossly disproportionate to the misconduct.
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice in disciplinary inquiries, asserting that findings must be supported by adequate evidence and fair procedures.
The main legal point established in the given judgment is the limited scope of judicial review in disciplinary inquiries and the principles of proportionality and the Wednesbury rule.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of interference in disciplinary proceedings, emphasizing the need for evidence-based findings and the principles of proportionali....
Judicial review of disciplinary actions is limited; courts do not interfere unless findings are perverse or punishment is shockingly disproportionate.
The court upheld the removal of a police constable for intoxication during duty, emphasizing the importance of discipline in law enforcement and the limited scope of judicial review in disciplinary m....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.