MANISH CHOUDHURY
Kezhalesa Kuotsu S/O Kedoru Kuotsu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Ms. Z. Zhimoni, learned counsel assisted by Mr. Toshi O. Longkumer and Mr. Abel Ayemi, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. L.T. Sangtam, learned Additional Advocate General, Nagaland along with Mr. V. Zhimomi, learned Government Advocate, Nagaland for the respondent no. 1; Mr. T.B. Jamir, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 to 5; and Mr. Tongpok Pongener, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 6 to 45.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioners, 15 [fifteen] in nos., have assailed the appointments made in favour of the respondent nos. 6 to 45 as Sub-Inspector of Police [SI]/Unarmed Branch Sub-Inspector of Police [UBSI]/Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police [ASI]/Instructor Havildar in Nagaland Police by the State respondent authorities on different dates in the years 2019 and 2020, vide Orders of Appointment, annexed as Annexure-B to Annexure-B-37 to the writ petition.
3. The main ground to assail the Orders of Appointments of the respondent nos. 6 to 45 is that the State respondent authorities had appointed the respondent nos. 6 to 45 without undertaking any valid process of recruitment and without publication of any kind of advertisement. It is the case of th
State of Orissa and another vs. Mamata Mahanty
Binod Kumar Gupta and others vs. Ram Ashray Mahoto and others
Appointments to public posts must follow a transparent recruitment process, including advertisement, to uphold constitutional rights to equality and fair opportunity.
Appointments to public posts must be made through a transparent process involving public advertisement to ensure equality of opportunity as mandated by the Constitution.
The court upheld the validity of appointments made following a proper recruitment process, emphasizing adherence to constitutional mandates in public employment.
Eligibility for ex-servicemen posts must be assessed as of the last date of application submission, and selections made contrary to this principle are invalid.
(1) When appointment of candidates is a nullity in law making them disentitled to hold posts, principles of natural justice were not required to be complied with, particularly when same would be noth....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.