IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Budi Habung, J.
The Union Of India Through The Secretary Ministry Of Home Affairs, New Delhi And Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Abenla Imkong – Respondent
FA/1/2019
Decided On : 02-09-2024
Land - Ownership - Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Sections 96, Order IV, Rule 1 - The court upheld the land settlement order issued by the Deputy Commissioner, affirming the plaintiff's ownership based on government approval and subsequent transfers, while dismissing the appellant's claims of prior possession.
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiff claimed ownership of a plot of land in Mokokchung, Nagaland, based on a government land settlement order and subsequent purchase from the original landowner. The defendants, claiming long-term possession, contested the plaintiff's ownership.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the plaintiff had valid ownership documents, including a land settlement order and a residential permit, while the defendants failed to provide evidence of legal ownership or challenge the settlement order.
Issues: The main issues included the validity of the land settlement order, the plaintiff's ownership rights, and the defendants' claims of prior possession.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the land settlement order was valid and unchallenged, establishing the plaintiff's rightful ownership, while the defendants' claims of possession were unsupported by legal documentation.
Result: The appeal was dismissed, upholding the trial court's decree in favor of the plaintiff.
JUDGMENT :
Budi Habung, J.
Heard Mr. W.R. Ngullie, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. Taka Masa, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. Arenlong, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. This appeal filed under section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), 1908 is directed against the impugned judgment and decree dated 29.9.2018 passed by the Court of the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Mokokchung, Nagaland in Civil Suit No.01/2018. By the said impugned decree, the suit land located at Sangemla Ward, Mokokchung Town has been declared in favour of the plaintiff/respondent herein and the appellant has been stopped from any activities on the decreed land and ordered that the plaintiff/respondent to hold, enjoy and possess the said land without any hindrance from the defendant/appellant herein.
3. The present appellants are the defendants No.1 & 2 in the title suit No.01/2018 before the trial court filed by the respondent/Plaintiff. The respondent, as plaintiff, preferred a suit for declaration of rights, title, interest, recovery of possession and perpetual injunction and eviction against the defendants/ appellants herein under Rule 24 of the Administration of Justice and Police in Nagaland r/w Order IV, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure pertains to a plot of land located at Sangtemla ward Mokokchung town.
4. For the sake of convenience, the parties in the appeal are referred to, as per their status in the suit in trial court as plaintiff/respondent herein and defendants/appellants.
5. As per the plaint, averment and the contention of the plaintiff/respondent herein in the suit is that:
| North | Measuring 100 ft demarcated by road to circuit house; |
| South | measuring 100 ft demarcated with the land of Late P. Shilu Ao; |
| East | measuring 73 ft and demarcated by the building occupied by Office of the S.I.B; |
| West | measuring 65 ft and demarcated with AMC. |
(c) Thereafter, the Deputy commissioner, Mokokchung Nagaland by an order dated 18-10-1978 issued a land settlement order of the said land in question in the name of Shri L. Sosang Jamir (previous owner). Thereafter, Shri L. Sosang Jamir (previous owner) was permitted to hold a residential permit No.2045 in his name issued from the office of the Municipal Council Mokokchung, Nagaland dated 29-03-1979.
(d) Subsequently, the disputed plot of land was purchased by the present plaintiff from Shri Imnaangshi & 7 others of Tzuwar clan of Ungma village (Original Land Owner) for consideration amount of Rs.1,00,000/-only by executing a Sale Agreement dated 06-08-2014.
(e) Thereafter, Shri L. Sosang Jamir (previous owner) by letter dated 25-03-15, intimated to the Deputy Commissioner, Mokokchung Nagaland that the residential permit No.2045 which was issued in his name is being transferred in favour of Smti. Abenla Imkong (Plaintiff).
(f) That in view of the said transferred dated 25-03-2015 made by the Deputy Commissioner, Mokokchung, Nagaland that the plaintiff has become the absolute and rightful owner of the suit land and accordingly, on dated 16-05-2015, the Sub Divisional Officer (Civil) Mokokchung Nagaland allowed the transfer of residential permit No.2045 in the name of Smti. Abenla Imkong.
(g) That the sketch map in respect of the schedule of the suit land has drawn up by the Land Record and Survey Officer (LRSO) Mokokchung, Nagaland dated 04-05-2015 and the same has been subsequently approved by the State authority.
(h) That since an old building existed in th
The court affirmed that unchallenged land settlement orders establish ownership rights, overriding claims of prior possession without legal backing.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and providing a reasonable opportunity for the parties to present their case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that ownership rights over land must be supported by valid evidence and in accordance with the provisions of the Mizo District (Land and Revenue) A....
Revenue Authorities cannot adjudicate land title disputes; such matters must be resolved by Civil Courts under the Assam Land Revenue Regulation, 1886.
A valid land allotment must be canceled before a subsequent allotment can be deemed lawful, reaffirming the plaintiffs' ownership rights and possession under the Tripura Land Revenue and Land Reforms....
Restoration of lawful land ownership rights requires adherence to proper transfer processes as per land revenue acts; cancellation without due procedure is invalid.
Revenue authorities lack jurisdiction to determine land title disputes, which must be settled in civil courts, rendering related appeals maintainable under proper legal challenges.
Government land allotment confers rights to the allottee, validating the maintainability of an injunction suit despite disputes over title.
Point of Law : Revenue record – Record of Right - Though these entries have been held to be having no legal basis yet these could be looked into for collateral purposes.
The court held that a title deed must be substantiated with clear evidence, and the Survey Commissioner's findings are critical in resolving land disputes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.